Skip to content

What is the motivation behind replacing the fp16 Neumann inverse with an 8x8 fp32 forward substitution #34

Description

@zilanlia

Hi, I noticed that matrix inversion in kernel1 has changed from Neumann inverse to forward substitution. There appears to be little difference in data precision error between these two methods. May I ask what the motivation behind this change is?

Does forward substitution offer better performance?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions