Skip to content

Conversation

@BJSS-russell-pollock
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Context

Type of changes

  • Refactoring (non-breaking change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

  • I have followed the code style of the project
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • This PR is a result of pair or mob programming
  • Exceptions/Exclusions to coding standards (e.g. #noqa or #NOSONAR) are included within this Pull Request.

Sensitive Information Declaration

To ensure the utmost confidentiality and protect your and others privacy, we kindly ask you to NOT including PII (Personal Identifiable Information) / PID (Personal Identifiable Data) or any other sensitive data in this PR (Pull Request) and the codebase changes. We will remove any PR that do contain any sensitive information. We really appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

  • I confirm that neither PII/PID nor sensitive data are included in this PR and the codebase changes.

@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock changed the title [GPCAPIM-260]-[Steel Thread integration testing]-[RP]-3 [GPCAPIM-260]-[Steel Thread integration testing]-[RP]-4 Feb 5, 2026
@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock force-pushed the feature/GPCAPIM-260-4 branch 3 times, most recently from 20cf631 to d6551d9 Compare February 5, 2026 12:15
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 5, 2026

@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock force-pushed the feature/GPCAPIM-260-4 branch 16 times, most recently from cef02da to 278a4a7 Compare February 5, 2026 17:07
@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock changed the title [GPCAPIM-260]-[Steel Thread integration testing]-[RP]-4 [GPCAPIM-260]-[Steel Thread integration testing]-[RP] Feb 5, 2026
@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock self-assigned this Feb 5, 2026
@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock force-pushed the feature/GPCAPIM-260-4 branch 3 times, most recently from 803df79 to 926204f Compare February 9, 2026 16:14
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Trivy gate: no Critical/High vulnerabilities.

Trivy Image Scan Summary

Image: 900119715266.dkr.ecr.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/whoami:feature-gpcapim-260-4

Severity Count
CRITICAL 0
HIGH 0
MEDIUM 0
LOW 1
UNKNOWN 0
Findings (top 50)
Severity ID Package Installed Fixed Source
LOW CVE-2026-1703 pip 25.3 26.0 Python

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Trivy gate: no Critical/High issues.

Trivy IaC (Terraform) Summary

Severity Count
CRITICAL 0
HIGH 0
MEDIUM 0
LOW 0
UNKNOWN 0
Findings (top 50)
Severity ID Title File

@github-actions
Copy link

Deployment Complete

BJSS-russell-pollock and others added 7 commits February 10, 2026 17:14
…ecord]-[RP] (#36)

<!-- markdownlint-disable-next-line first-line-heading -->
## Description

As a Tester

I want to investigate and assess the GP Connect Demonstrator Get Patient
Resource endpoint for potential use in the Steel Thread Get Patient
Resource work.

So that we can set up what we believe is the correct response body
structure and enable a simple manual API test to support preparation. We
are not proving anything at this stage.

## Context

<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->

GP Connect demonstrator has an existing endpoint that is capable of
retrieving a FIHR STU3 patient resource by patient id
https://orange.testlab.nhs.uk/

<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply. -->

- [ ] Refactoring (non-breaking change)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing
functionality)
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## Checklist

<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->

- [x] I have followed the code style of the project
- [x] I have added tests to cover my changes
- [x] I have updated the documentation accordingly
- [] This PR is a result of pair or mob programming
- [] Exceptions/Exclusions to coding standards (e.g. #noqa or #NOSONAR)
are included within this Pull Request.

---

## Sensitive Information Declaration

To ensure the utmost confidentiality and protect your and others
privacy, we kindly ask you to NOT including [PII (Personal Identifiable
Information) / PID (Personal Identifiable
Data)](https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/keeping-data-safe-and-benefitting-the-public)
or any other sensitive data in this PR (Pull Request) and the codebase
changes. We will remove any PR that do contain any sensitive
information. We really appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

- [x] I confirm that neither PII/PID nor sensitive data are included in
this PR and the codebase changes.
…arding them on to the controller/handler to process.
Creates the controller class that orchestrates calls to the other gateway components and to the GP provider. Integrates this with the API gateway, the PDS search module and the GP provider module. Updates integration-type tests to work with the steel thread.
By
* concatingating the openapi and x-nhsd-apim yamls to for a template
  specification,
* inserting the API variables/secrets into that template,
* and using the Proxygen CLI tool within the preview-env workflow to
  deploy an instance defined by that specification.
@BJSS-russell-pollock BJSS-russell-pollock deleted the feature/GPCAPIM-260-4 branch February 10, 2026 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants