Skip to content

Update project name and header in README #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
ConceptualFrameworks wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update project name and header in README #8

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
# 🧠 NB-Ecosystem: NeuralBlitz Production Implementation
# 🧠 NCX
## NeuralBlitz Production Implementation
Comment on lines +1 to +2
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot Apr 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

According to standard Markdown style guides (such as Markdownlint MD022), headers should be separated by blank lines. This improves readability and ensures consistent rendering across different platforms.

Suggested change
# 🧠 NCX
## NeuralBlitz Production Implementation
# 🧠 NCX
## NeuralBlitz Production Implementation
References
  1. Headers should be surrounded by blank lines to ensure proper rendering and readability. (link)

Comment on lines +1 to +2
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Apr 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify all occurrences of "NB-Ecosystem" in the README to assess scope of rename

echo "=== Searching for 'NB-Ecosystem' references ==="
rg -n "NB-Ecosystem" README.md

echo -e "\n=== Searching for 'ncx' or 'NCX' references ==="
rg -ni "ncx" README.md

echo -e "\n=== Checking repository name in git remote ==="
git remote get-url origin

Repository: NeuralBlitz/ncx

Length of output: 1656

Update all repository references from "NB-Ecosystem" to "ncx" — git clone command is broken.

The repository has been renamed to ncx (per git remote URL), but the documentation retains references to the old name "NB-Ecosystem" across 13 lines. Most critically, the git clone command at line 195 will fail:

  • Line 195 (git clone command): git clone https://github.com/NeuralBlitz/NB-Ecosystem.git → should be https://github.com/NeuralBlitz/ncx.git
  • Lines 6-9 (badge URLs): All point to /NeuralBlitz/NB-Ecosystem → should be /NeuralBlitz/ncx
  • Line 196 (directory name): cd NB-Ecosystem → should be cd ncx
  • Line 244 (directory structure): NB-Ecosystem/ → should be ncx/
  • Lines 290, 310, 311, 319, 321 (section headers, links, branding): All references to "NB-Ecosystem" need updating
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents 
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@README.md` around lines 1 - 2, README references the old repository name
"NB-Ecosystem" which breaks the git clone and various links; update all
occurrences to the new repo name "ncx" — specifically change the git clone URL
(the line containing "git clone https://github.com/NeuralBlitz/NB-Ecosystem.git"
to use "https://github.com/NeuralBlitz/ncx.git"), change any directory
references and examples ("cd NB-Ecosystem", "NB-Ecosystem/" in the directory
tree) to "cd ncx" and "ncx/", and update all badge and link URLs and headers
that point to /NeuralBlitz/NB-Ecosystem (badge URLs at the top and section
headers/links referenced around the noted lines) so they consistently use
/NeuralBlitz/ncx and display "ncx" or "NCX" branding where appropriate.


> **From theoretical research framework to enterprise-ready AI platform**

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -321,4 +322,4 @@ We built this as a **demonstration of transforming AI research into production**

**From 664,528 lines of research → 1,823 lines of production → $50M+ ARR potential** 🎯

</div>
</div>