[18.0][MIG] partner_archive_propagate

[ntsirintanis]

Migration from 16.0

[vanesanetkia]

LGTM: Functional review

[NL66278]

@ntsirintanis The extremely minor decrease in coverage for the project is due to these lines:

+         if "active" in vals:
+             if vals["active"] is False:
+                 archiving_partners = self.filtered(lambda self: self.active)
+             elif vals["active"] is True:
+                 unarchiving_partners = self.filtered(lambda self: not self.active)

So basically the elif never has a value that is not True at this point, because if there is a value for active it can only be True or False. So elif vals["active"] is True: can be replaced by just else:.

[Kiplangatdan]

@ntsirintanis Tested locally, works as expected.

Other than the code-coverage tests mentioned by Ronald.
It looks good.

[NL66278]

Please add a note to the USAGE section of the README that using the standard Archive action is still available as before and that the user can select either the standard action without propagation, or the button with propagation. OK, make that part of the currently planned improvement to 16.0, and it will come along with that.

[BhaveshHeliconia]

Code and functional review LGTM!