Skip to content

[19.0][MIG] sale_order_invoice_amount: Migration to 19.0#4367

Open
BhaveshHeliconia wants to merge 18 commits into
OCA:19.0from
HeliconiaIO:19.0-mig-sale_order_invoice_amount
Open

[19.0][MIG] sale_order_invoice_amount: Migration to 19.0#4367
BhaveshHeliconia wants to merge 18 commits into
OCA:19.0from
HeliconiaIO:19.0-mig-sale_order_invoice_amount

Conversation

@BhaveshHeliconia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added series:19.0 mod:sale_order_invoice_amount Module sale_order_invoice_amount labels May 26, 2026
Javier Iniesta and others added 12 commits May 26, 2026 17:46
Currently translated at 100.0% (5 of 5 strings)

Translation: sale-workflow-16.0/sale-workflow-16.0-sale_order_invoice_amount
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/sale-workflow-16-0/sale-workflow-16-0-sale_order_invoice_amount/fr/
Currently translated at 100.0% (5 of 5 strings)

Translation: sale-workflow-16.0/sale-workflow-16.0-sale_order_invoice_amount
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/sale-workflow-16-0/sale-workflow-16-0-sale_order_invoice_amount/it/
There are some cases when the amount to invoice is not actually updated when it needs to, so this adds the dependencies that base method has and adding the state of the SO to be able to get it updated when SO is confirmed.
@BhaveshHeliconia BhaveshHeliconia force-pushed the 19.0-mig-sale_order_invoice_amount branch 2 times, most recently from ff34736 to c0aa182 Compare May 27, 2026 04:24
@BhaveshHeliconia BhaveshHeliconia force-pushed the 19.0-mig-sale_order_invoice_amount branch from c0aa182 to 36b8916 Compare May 27, 2026 04:32
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/ocabot migration sale_order_invoice_amount

@BhaveshHeliconia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@stferraro Could you please review this? Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants