[17.0][ADD] sale_certification#42
Conversation
d1fdfb2 to
69a2d89
Compare
11f3e38 to
eccf6a3
Compare
|
Hello, could you please enable the Runboat? Thank you! |
|
Hi @edescalona can you rebase the branch and push it? Thanks! |
eccf6a3 to
0d02cb3
Compare
|
Hi @Yoana-RB @christian-ramos-tecnativa , runboat is now enabled. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall, the functionality is correct and the implementation is solid. The functional review is approved (LGTM). However, I have identified a few improvement points and pending aspects that would be worth reviewing, although these are non-blocking comments:
Translations: They do not appear to be implemented yet and should be added to ensure a consistent user experience across all supported languages.
UI improvements: The current certificate view could benefit from a clearer visual hierarchy. Adding a more representative title or header would improve readability and make it easier to identify the displayed information.
sale_certification/views/view_order_form_certify.xml
Grouped certifications: When certifying multiple orders, it may be worth considering support for grouped certificate management, either by allowing invoicing from a group of certificates or by grouping multiple orders within a single certificate. This would simplify scenarios where a consolidated invoice is generated from multiple orders.
Module to handle the certification step in a contruction company
ROADMAP: