SEO: Added titles and improved alts (Issue #524)#610
SEO: Added titles and improved alts (Issue #524)#610gureckyfrantisek wants to merge 3 commits intoOSGeo:masterfrom
Conversation
Checked the main page on https://seorch.net/ and added missing titles to the images it showed. To not repeat myself I also tried to improve the img alt texts for SEO by reading the Google Developer page on image SEO best practices here: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/google-images Google doesn't use the image titles for SEO purposes, the alt is more significant for it.
wenzeslaus
left a comment
wenzeslaus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Check the titles for consistency and meaning.
Kept the GIS keyword in the alts for SEO purposes and fixed the naming to be more consistent.
|
Thanks for the quick response. I think I saw what you meant, I kept the GIS keyword in GRASS logo alts and kept the same format for all of them. I also adjusted the alt for the OSGeo project, since it wasn't the logo of OSGeo, and made the DOI badge alt a bit more descriptive. See the proposed changes please, I am not sure if they get linked with the commit automatically. |
|
Please check branding on the website. |
|
I checked and I assume that it means I should remove the "GIS" keyword from GRASS logos alt texts, is that correct? |
GRASS is no longer branded as a GIS software, therefore the removal of GIS from image alts
I guess so. The PR looks fine to me. Is there something else with the branding, @wenzeslaus ? |
3 participants
Checked the current state of the main page (https://grass.osgeo.org/) on https://seorch.net/ and added missing titles to the images it showed.
To not repeat the alt texts I also tried to improve them for SEO by reading the Google Developer page on image SEO best practices here: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/google-images
Google doesn't use the image titles for SEO purposes, the alt is more significant for it.
This solves issue #524.