Add Bargo Congress Trades API candidate - #6
Open
bargo-ai wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I am Ankur, the developer behind Bargo. I would like to add the Bargo Congress Trades API to the candidate pool.
Provider
What changed
data/candidates/The candidate describes the hosted, read-only Congress product specifically. It covers normalized U.S. House and Senate STOCK Act disclosures through REST and MCP, and does not describe Bargo's broader market-intelligence platform.
I marked six checks as supported or partial using Bargo's public documentation, dashboard, and terms. The remaining checks stay
unknownwhere the public documentation does not make a clear claim. The automation check is intentionallypartialbecause the terms allow use in applications and agents while restricting raw-data redistribution, rate-limit evasion, and competing data products.Rules checklist
supported/partialcheck has an official evidence URLunknownstaysunknownwhere evidence is missingverifieddatenpm run validateREADME.mdor commit anything undergenerated/submitted_by: vendoris set because I work on BargoValidation
npm run validate: 76 providers + 3 candidates, 948 checks, 0 errorsnpm run probe -- --only=bargo-congress: 5 unique URLs, 5 healthy, 0 inconclusive, 0 brokengit diff --checkDisclosure
I am the developer behind Bargo and am submitting this as a vendor-maintained candidate entry.