generated from amazon-archives/__template_Apache-2.0
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
fix: reject control characters in job names #263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
crowecawcaw
merged 3 commits into
OpenJobDescription:mainline
from
crowecawcaw:fix-control-chars
Feb 20, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the difference between this and
_standard_string_regex?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The model uses two regex engines: one is Rust's that's embedded in Pydantic and the other is Python's. They have slightly different syntax.
_standard_string_regexis formatted for Pydantic/Rust's engine with\zand this regex is formatted for Python with\Z. This regex in this class is eventually evaluated here:openjd-model-for-python/src/openjd/model/_format_strings/_dyn_constrained_str.py
Line 55 in 96651fa
Here's another example of Python regexes in use in the model:
openjd-model-for-python/src/openjd/model/v2023_09/_model.py
Line 250 in 96651fa
Not sure there's a good reason for it. I'm guessing it is an outcome of upgrading from Pydantic v1 to v2.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1. From Kiro:
The lowercase
\zseems to be the correct choice here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I remember there being something different between
\zand\Zbetween pydantic v2 and Python regexes, because pydantic v2 switched to using the Rust regex crate.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
\Zvs\zdifference is intentional due to two different regex engines being in play:_standard_string_regex(used byJobName,StepName,EnvironmentNamevia pydanticStringConstraints) uses lowercase\z— this is correct because pydantic v2 validates these patterns viapydantic-core, which uses the Rustregexcrate. In Rust regex,\zis the absolute end-of-string anchor. RefJobTemplateName._regex(used byDynamicConstrainedStr._validate) uses uppercase\Z— this is correct because validation runs through Python'sre.match(). In Python'sremodule,\Zmatches only at the absolute end of the string (it does NOT match before a trailing newline, unlike$). Python doesn't support lowercase\zin versions before 3.14 — it throwsre.PatternError: bad escape \z. RefSo both are equivalent in behavior (absolute end-of-string), just spelled differently for their respective engines.
I've added additional tests to verify newlines are handled correctly.