Skip to content

Flag South Dakota partial-year model coverage instead of averaging missing policy as zero #3

Description

@hua7450

For one adult earning $30,000/year with children ages 3 and 7 and $1,500/month per child, the app shows South Dakota subsidy of $534.90/month and ranks it near the bottom.

The model returns $1,283.75/month for August–December 2026 and zero for January–July. Its sd_cca formula explicitly says the earlier hourly county-based schedule is not implemented; the zero is a model-coverage limitation. Averaging five supported months with seven zeros produces $534.90.

This makes incomplete model coverage look like a less generous state policy, and also affects potential annual subsidy estimates.

Use a supported reference month or implement the earlier schedule upstream. Until then, visibly mark affected comparisons and annual totals as incomplete rather than presenting missing policy as an actual zero benefit. Preserve the distinction between an unmodeled period and a genuine zero payment.

Sources: scripts/precompute.py, South Dakota model.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions