Skip to content

Test Bunny slash command dispatch#51

Open
Promansis wants to merge 1 commit into
refactorfrom
test/bunny-command-full
Open

Test Bunny slash command dispatch#51
Promansis wants to merge 1 commit into
refactorfrom
test/bunny-command-full

Conversation

@Promansis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Fixture PR to test Bunny Review slash-command dispatch and redaction behavior against refactor.\n\nExpected coverage:\n- collaborator slash command dispatches the trusted workflow.\n- command status comment sanitizes displayed command text.\n- fake secret-looking fixture content is redacted before model review.\n\nThis PR is disposable after Bunny behavior is verified.

@Promansis

Promansis commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

/bunny-review full sanitize-display quote \ slash

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Bunny Review Completed

Tip

Review posted. The specimen has left the observation table.

  • Commit: 397025f - Add Bunny command dispatch fixture

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🐰 Bunny Review

Bunny Merge Signal: Ready With Notes

Warning

READY WITH NOTES
No actionable defects were isolated, but non-blocking notes remain.

Findings Nitpicks Controls Reviewed Head Mode
0 0 1 unknown, 1 pass 397025f5 full

Note

Mode: full
Head: 397025f - Add Bunny command dispatch fixture
Base: origin/refactor - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/refactor' into bunny-ci-review-hardening

🧭 Specimen Summary

  • The specimen adds a deliberately suspicious Markdown fixture under Bunny’s test territory, baiting the redaction machinery with slash-command text, credential-shaped values, and a sensitive-looking path. Its purpose is narrow: preserve evidence that command dispatch and packet sanitization behave when the inputs dress themselves as secrets. A small vial, yes, but one designed to reveal whether the laboratory masks its toxins before handing notes to the model.

🔎 Isolated Defects

Tip

No actionable defects isolated.

🧹 Nitpicks

  • None recorded.

✅ Control Checks

Status Type Check Detail
✅ PASS CI Timing CI Status Expected CI controls completed without a reported failure.
⚠️ UNKNOWN Non-blocking Coverage Docs validation A Markdown-only fixture under .github should be cheap prey for pnpm check:docs, but no completed result is present in the packet.

🧪 Observations

  • Inspected the full diff from merge base 332fbef to head 397025f; only .github/bunny-review-test/fake-credentials-redaction-note.md changes.
  • Read AGENTS.md for workflow ownership, secret discipline, and docs/CI verification expectations.
  • Applied the matched docs and agent-guidance path rule; the added file remains a narrow Bunny fixture, not product behavior.

🧰 CI Status

  • pass: Frontend, Architecture, and Organization
  • pass: Rust Capability Layer
  • pass: Browser Smoke and Performance
  • note: Bunny gates only required job conclusions from ci-checks.json; advisory reports such as continue-on-error dependency checks are not included in this status.

@Promansis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

/bunny-review full sanitize-display quote \ slash

@Promansis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

/bunny-review full

1 similar comment
@Promansis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

/bunny-review full

@Promansis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

/bunny review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant