Skip to content

Add existential crisis function to prove 1 == 1#76

Merged
itsdakshjain merged 3 commits into
Py-Contributors:mainfrom
Pranav-MSK:add/is_one_using_existential_crisis
May 27, 2026
Merged

Add existential crisis function to prove 1 == 1#76
itsdakshjain merged 3 commits into
Py-Contributors:mainfrom
Pranav-MSK:add/is_one_using_existential_crisis

Conversation

@Pranav-MSK

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Adds is_one_using_existential_crisis() — a function that proves 1 == 1 by first establishing that existence itself is real, filtering out the void (it contributes nothing, as expected), and arriving at 1 through Cartesian logic.Cogito ergo sum → Computas ergo unum.

Closes #


Type of Change

  • feat
  • fix
  • docs
  • refactor
  • chore
  • accidental genius

Checklist

Overengineering Verification

  • I have introduced at least one unnecessary abstraction layer
  • The solution is more complex than the problem warrants
  • A reasonable engineer would question at least one design decision
  • I have named something in a way that requires further explanation

Validation

  • pytest passes locally with no failures
  • New functionality is covered by tests
  • I have not deleted tests to make CI green
  • Documentation has been updated if needed

Traceability

  • This PR references a related issue
  • The branch name vaguely reflects the chaos introduced

General

  • Future contributors may question my decisions, but not my confidence
  • Code has been self-reviewed
  • No secrets, credentials, or hardcoded paths were smuggled in
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines

Screenshots (if applicable)


Additional Notes

This function requires zero imports. The entire proof runs on pure stdlib and unresolved feelings about existence.
Key engineering decisions made responsibly:

  • The void is appended to the list before being removed. It needed to exist briefly, to be excluded. This mirrors life.
  • sum_ is named with a trailing underscore to avoid shadowing the builtin sum. This is the single most professional line of code in this repository.
  • conceptual_one is derived from int(True). This is load-bearing philosophy. Do not refactor.

"Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand — but we don't do that here."

Signed-off-by: Pranav M S Krishnan <pranavmskrishnan@gmail.com>

@itsdakshjain itsdakshjain left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution @Pranav-MSK but you have only changed the is_one_one.py and pr required the change in test file too

Signed-off-by: Pranav M S Krishnan <pranavmskrishnan@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Logic Verified!

The Automated Logic Suite has confirmed that 1 is still 1.

  • Environment: Ubuntu-latest
  • Status: Mathematical Sanity Confirmed

You are safe to merge this chaos.

@Pranav-MSK

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@itsdakshjain , changes done.

Signed-off-by: Daksh Jain <dakshjain1265@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Logic Verified!

The Automated Logic Suite has confirmed that 1 is still 1.

  • Environment: Ubuntu-latest
  • Status: Mathematical Sanity Confirmed

You are safe to merge this chaos.

@itsdakshjain itsdakshjain left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was missing funtion calling in is_one_just_to_be_sure()
adding myself and merging

@itsdakshjain itsdakshjain merged commit 85c9377 into Py-Contributors:main May 27, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants