Skip to content

🌐 [translation-sync] [lq_robust_bewley] verify observational equivalence - #269

Open
mmcky wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
translation-sync-2026-08-24T03-10-58-pr-1040
Open

🌐 [translation-sync] [lq_robust_bewley] verify observational equivalence#269
mmcky wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
translation-sync-2026-08-24T03-10-58-pr-1040

Conversation

@mmcky

@mmcky mmcky commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated Translation Sync

This PR contains automated translations from QuantEcon/lecture-python.myst.

Source PR

#1040 - [lq_robust_bewley] verify observational equivalence

Files Updated

  • ✏️ lectures/lq_robust_bewley.md
  • ✏️ .translate/state/lq_robust_bewley.md.yml

Details

  • Source Language: en
  • Target Language: zh-cn
  • Model: claude-sonnet-5

This PR was created automatically by the translation action.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 24, 2026 03:11
@mmcky mmcky added action-translation PRs created by QuantEcon/action-translation automated Automated sync PR opened by action-translation labels Aug 24, 2026
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for astonishing-narwhal-a8fc64 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 77c43b5
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/astonishing-narwhal-a8fc64/deploys/6a8bb6481eecab00089d8e0d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-269--astonishing-narwhal-a8fc64.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Translation Quality Review

Verdict: PASS | Model: claude-sonnet-5 | Date: 2026-08-24
Routing: editor — 2 minor finding(s) in gating categories (accuracy/terminology/syntax/diff-check/other); terminology 8 below floor 9
Shadow gate: would NOT auto-merge (recorded only; no action taken)


📝 Translation Quality

Criterion Score
Accuracy 9/10
Fluency 9/10
Terminology 8/10
Formatting 10/10
Overall 8.9/10

Summary: 改动章节的翻译总体质量很高,准确传达了稳健贝利模型的技术内容和数学推导,术语使用基本统一,MyST/Markdown 格式与代码块完整无损。主要问题集中在'gross interest rate'一词的翻译前后不一致(一处译为'总名义利率',一处译为'总回报率'),建议统一为'总利率'或'总回报率'以避免与'名义利率'概念混淆;其余为个别措辞可进一步打磨的细节,不影响整体理解。 数学公式、代码块与 MyST 指令格式在改动章节中完整保留,未见语法错误 核心概念如'观测等价轨迹''稳健性参数''最坏情形'等术语在全文中保持高度一致 长难句(如命题证明、脚注式说明)在中文中被合理拆分,读起来自然流畅,专业语域把握得当

Suggestions:

  • [minor · accuracy] lectures/lq_robust_bewley.md — ## Equilibrium with heterogeneous types (proposition part 2): 英文原文 'a robust Bewley equilibrium... $R = \beta^{-1}$ is an equilibrium gross interest rate' 中的 'equilibrium gross interest rate' 被译为'均衡总名义利率',但原文是 'gross interest rate'(总利率/总回报率),并非'名义利率'(nominal interest rate)。'总名义利率'一词容易与 nominal interest rate 混淆,术语表中'Gross nominal interest rate'专指含通胀因素的名义利率,与此处纯粹的实际总回报率概念不同。 → 将'均衡总名义利率'改为'均衡总利率'或'均衡总回报率'
  • [minor · terminology] lectures/lq_robust_bewley.md — ## Equilibrium with heterogeneous types (proof): 同样,证明部分中 '面对总回报率 $R = \beta^{-1}$' 与命题陈述中的'均衡总名义利率'用词不一致(一处译为'总回报率',一处译为'总名义利率'),造成同一概念(gross interest rate)在文中术语不统一。 → 统一使用'总利率'或'总回报率'翻译 'gross interest rate',避免与'总名义利率'混用
  • [nit · fluency] lectures/lq_robust_bewley.md — ## Where the agents genuinely differ: '代理人 $i$ 的边际效用的最坏情形规律' 中'规律'翻译 'law' 略显生硬,虽可理解但不够自然,可考虑更贴近中文习惯的表达。 → 可译为'代理人 $i$ 边际效用的最坏情形演化规律'或'最坏情形运动规律'
  • [nit · fluency] lectures/lq_robust_bewley.md — ## Computation: '这项检验确实具有区分力'翻译 'this test has power' 基本准确,但'区分力'在统计学语境中通常指检验的'检验力/功效'(power),此处上下文虽为非正式用法,仍可考虑更贴切的措辞以避免与统计学术语'检验力'混淆。 → 可保留现状,或改为'这项检验确实能够发挥作用'

🔍 Diff Quality

Check Status
Scope Correct
Position Correct
Structure Preserved
Heading-map Correct
Overall 10/10

Summary: The translation sync correctly added all new paragraphs, equations, code cells, and the exercise note in the same relative positions as the English source, preserving document structure and requiring no heading-map changes.

Issues:

  • In the exercise 4 solution, the English target changes the DEP target from 0.2 to 0.25 and adds a new closing note block explaining why; the Chinese translation correctly mirrors the 0.25 target, the note block, and the '0.2' reference inside the note, so this is consistent — no discrepancy found here after review.
  • No new top-level or sub headings were introduced in the English source (no ## or ### additions), so the heading map correctly remains unchanged; this was verified against all new paragraphs/content.

This review was generated automatically by action-translation review mode.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions
github-actions Bot temporarily deployed to pull request August 24, 2026 04:30 Inactive
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

action-translation PRs created by QuantEcon/action-translation automated Automated sync PR opened by action-translation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants