chore(quantecon): track PR #81 in fork trackers and cut qe-v9 metadata - #82
Merged
Conversation
…N.yml and UPSTREAM-PRS.yml Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates QuantEcon fork tracking metadata to record the post-merge status of PR #81 (“per-row equation numbering”) and stage it as an upstream candidate.
Changes:
- Append merged feature entry
id: 14forper-row-equation-numberinginquantecon/VERSION.yml(includinglocal_pr,merge_sha, andtag: null). - Add a new
upstream_candidatesentryper-row-equation-numberinginquantecon/UPSTREAM-PRS.ymlwith status, commit pointer, and upstream/cherry-pick notes.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| quantecon/VERSION.yml | Records PR #81 as merged feature entry 14 with metadata for downstream tag checkpointing. |
| quantecon/UPSTREAM-PRS.yml | Adds the PR #81 feature as a pending upstream candidate with rationale and replay caveats. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Author
|
Updated: this PR now also cuts the qe-v9 metadata — |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Post-merge maintenance round for #81 (per-row equation numbering, squash
756a4d5d).VERSION.yml— appendsmerged_featuresentry 14 (per-row-equation-numbering,local_pr: 81,merge_sha: 756a4d5d,tag: null).UPSTREAM-PRS.yml— adds theper-row-equation-numberingupstream candidate (status: pending, single squash commit). The notes capture the upstream pitch (no upstream issue tracks this; PDF export already numbers per-row while HTML numbers per-block, so mystmd currently disagrees with itself across outputs), that the katex^0.16.21bump rides in the same squash and is independently useful upstream, and a cherry-pick caveat: theenumerate.tschanges sit textually inside fork-modified book-mode code, so replaying ontoupstream/mainwill need a small rework or bundling afterbook-mode-with-section-scope.Tag status after this lands: entries 12–14 (
ci-deflake,ipynb-attachment-fixes,per-row-equation-numbering) aretag: null— aqe-v9checkpoint covering all three is available whenever book-dp1/book-dp2 should pick up per-row numbering via a pinned tag.🤖 Generated with Claude Code