-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Implement Sub-Agent Architecture for Researcher Agent #426
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Implement Sub-Agent Architecture for Researcher Agent #426
Conversation
This commit introduces a new sub-agent architecture to the researcher agent, enabling it to orchestrate specialized sub-agents for querying various endpoints. Key changes: - Created a new router agent (`lib/agents/router-agent.ts`) to delegate tasks to sub-agents. - Implemented mock services for Azure ONNX and Google Cloud embeddings (`lib/services/mock-satellite-services.ts`). - Defined new sub-agent tools for satellite image analysis and embedding generation (`lib/agents/tools/satellite-tools.ts`). - Integrated the new router agent into the existing `resolutionSearch` agent (`lib/agents/resolution-search.tsx`). - Added a new UI component (`components/chat/satellite-intelligence-display.tsx`) to display the structured results from the sub-agents. - Updated `app/actions.tsx` to handle the new message type and render the new UI component. Note: The automated tests and development server were not functional in the development environment, preventing automated and manual verification. This issue should be investigated separately.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
|
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
|
@coderabbitai 19:42:49.124 Running build in Portland, USA (West) – pdx1 |
This commit resolves a build failure by adding the `satellite_intelligence` type to the `AIMessage` type definition in `lib/types/index.ts`. This is necessary to support the new sub-agent architecture and the associated UI components. This change is a direct response to the build error identified in the pull request comments.
This commit resolves a build failure caused by an incorrect usage of the 'streamObject' function from the Vercel AI SDK. The previous implementation attempted to destructure a 'toolResult' property that does not exist on the returned object. The code has been updated to: 1. Await the 'streamObject' result. 2. Access the 'toolCalls' array from the result. 3. Manually look up and execute the corresponding tool from the 'satelliteTools' map. This change aligns with the Vercel AI SDK's API and fixes the TypeScript compilation error.
This commit resolves the final build failure by refactoring the router agent to use the correct pattern for tool routing with the Vercel AI SDK. The previous implementation incorrectly passed a `tools` property to the `streamObject` function, which is not supported. The `router-agent` now uses the `generateObject` function with a Zod schema to have the model *decide* which tool to use. It then uses a `switch` statement to *execute* the chosen tool. This is the correct and documented pattern for routing. This change fixes the TypeScript error and aligns the implementation with the Vercel AI SDK's best practices.
This commit resolves the final build failure by providing the correct number of arguments to the `execute` function on the tool instances. The `tool` utility from the Vercel AI SDK wraps the provided `execute` function in a new function that expects two arguments: the arguments object and a `ToolCallOptions` object. The previous implementation was only passing the arguments object, which caused a TypeScript error. This commit fixes the issue by passing an empty object as the second argument to the `execute` function for both tools in the router agent.
This commit resolves the final build failure by refactoring the satellite tools to be plain functions and schemas, completely decoupling them from the Vercel AI SDK's `ai/tool` helper. The previous implementation was causing a series of cascading build errors due to a misunderstanding of how the `tool` helper interacts with the `generateObject` function. This refactoring simplifies the code and eliminates the API mismatch. The `satellite-tools.ts` file now exports plain Zod schemas and async `execute` functions. The `router-agent.ts` has been updated to import these directly and call them, which resolves the TypeScript errors related to `ToolExecutionOptions`. This is the final fix for the sub-agent architecture implementation.
PR Compliance Guide 🔍Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Compliance status legend🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant 🔴 - Not Compliant ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification 🏷️ - Compliance label |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
|||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main issue is unsafe assumptions about tool outputs: routerAgent can return embeddings or { error: ... }, but resolutionSearch and the UI treat the result as SatelliteIntelligence, leading to likely runtime crashes (toFixed, .map, JSON.parse). The router also does not detect image presence and hard-codes getModel(true), risking unnecessary cost/latency and incorrect routing. Tool error handling currently returns ad-hoc objects that aren’t represented downstream; adopt a consistent discriminated/enveloped result to make failures and non-image routes safe.
Additional notes (1)
- Maintainability |
app/actions.tsx:122-130
analysisResult.satelliteIntelligenceis stringified unconditionally, butresolutionSearch()always adds this field even when the router returns an error object (e.g.,{ error: 'Failed...' }) or when the chosen tool isgenerateEmbeddings(which would not haveanalysis/confidenceScore/detectedObjects). This can lead to UI/runtime failures (e.g.,SatelliteIntelligenceDisplaycalling.toFixed()and.map()on nonconforming data) orJSON.stringify(undefined)producingundefinedand thenJSON.parsethrowing later.
Summary of changes
Overview
Introduces a sub-agent routing flow for the resolutionSearch path, adds mock satellite/embedding services, and extends the chat UI to render a new structured message type.
Key changes
- New message type: Adds
"satellite_intelligence"toAIMessage.typeand appends this message inapp/actions.tsx. - New UI: Adds
components/chat/satellite-intelligence-display.tsxto render structured satellite intelligence results. - Resolution search refactor:
lib/agents/resolution-search.tsxnow delegates to a newrouterAgent, then adapts the tool output into the existing{ summary, geoJson }shape and additionally returnssatelliteIntelligence. - New router agent:
lib/agents/router-agent.tsusesgenerateObject+ Zod union to select a tool and executes it. - New tools + mock services:
lib/agents/tools/satellite-tools.tsexports schemas +execute*functions.lib/services/mock-satellite-services.tsprovides mocked ONNX analysis and embedding generation.
| 'use client' | ||
|
|
||
| import type { SatelliteIntelligence } from '@/lib/services/mock-satellite-services' | ||
|
|
||
| interface SatelliteIntelligenceDisplayProps { | ||
| data: SatelliteIntelligence | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * A React component to display the structured satellite intelligence data. | ||
| */ | ||
| export function SatelliteIntelligenceDisplay({ | ||
| data | ||
| }: SatelliteIntelligenceDisplayProps) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <div className="bg-zinc-800 text-white p-4 rounded-lg my-4 border border-zinc-700"> | ||
| <h3 className="font-bold text-lg mb-3 text-zinc-200">Satellite Intelligence Analysis</h3> | ||
| <div className="mb-2"> | ||
| <strong className="text-zinc-400">Analysis:</strong> | ||
| <p className="text-zinc-300 pl-2">{data.analysis}</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="mb-2"> | ||
| <strong className="text-zinc-400">Confidence Score:</strong> | ||
| <p className="text-zinc-300 pl-2">{data.confidenceScore.toFixed(2)}</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <strong className="text-zinc-400">Detected Objects:</strong> | ||
| <ul className="list-disc list-inside pl-2"> | ||
| {data.detectedObjects.map((obj, index) => ( | ||
| <li key={index} className="text-zinc-300"> | ||
| {obj} | ||
| </li> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </ul> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This component assumes data.confidenceScore is a number and data.detectedObjects is an array. Given the current upstream code can emit { error: ... } or an embeddings result, this can crash at render time (toFixed / map). Components should defensively render when given unexpected payloads (especially when fed by LLM/tool chains).
Suggestion
Add a lightweight runtime guard (or accept an envelope type) and render an error state.
if (!data || typeof data.confidenceScore !== 'number' || !Array.isArray(data.detectedObjects)) {
return <div className="bg-zinc-800 text-white p-4 rounded-lg">No satellite intelligence available.</div>
}If you adopt an { ok, data, error } envelope, render error explicitly.
Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.
| // 2. Execute the chosen tool based on the object returned by the model. | ||
| switch (toolChoice.tool) { | ||
| case 'analyzeSatelliteImage': { | ||
| const result = await executeAnalyzeSatelliteImage(); | ||
| console.log('Router agent executed analyzeSatelliteImage:', result); | ||
| return result; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The router selects a tool and receives toolChoice.args, but for analyzeSatelliteImage you ignore toolChoice.args and call executeAnalyzeSatelliteImage() with no args. This makes the schema-driven routing misleading and will break if the tool later gains required parameters.
Suggestion
Thread the args through consistently, even if currently empty, to keep the API stable.
case 'analyzeSatelliteImage': {
const result = await executeAnalyzeSatelliteImage(toolChoice.args)
return result
}…and update executeAnalyzeSatelliteImage to accept z.infer<typeof analyzeSatelliteImageSchema>.
Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.
| // 1. Use `generateObject` to get the model's choice of tool and arguments. | ||
| const { object: toolChoice } = await generateObject({ | ||
| model: await getModel(true), // Assuming image analysis requires a powerful model | ||
| messages, | ||
| schema: routerSchema, | ||
| prompt: 'Given the user request and the image, which tool is most appropriate? If an image is present, use analyzeSatelliteImage.', | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
getModel(true) is hard-coded with a comment "Assuming image analysis requires a powerful model". But the router is also used to decide between tools, and the prompt says "If an image is present..."—yet you never actually detect whether an image is present in messages. This can cause unnecessary cost/latency and incorrect routing when no image exists.
Suggestion
Detect image presence from messages (similar to the previous resolutionSearch logic) and pass that into getModel(hasImage). Also adjust the prompt to avoid referencing an image when none exists.
const hasImage = messages.some(m => Array.isArray(m.content) && m.content.some(p => p.type === 'image'))
const { object: toolChoice } = await generateObject({
model: await getModel(hasImage),
messages,
schema: routerSchema,
prompt: hasImage
? 'Select the best tool; an image is present.'
: 'Select the best tool; no image is present.',
})Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.
| /** | ||
| * Executes the logic for analyzing a satellite image by calling the mock service. | ||
| */ | ||
| export async function executeAnalyzeSatelliteImage() { | ||
| try { | ||
| console.log('Executing analyzeSatelliteImage tool...'); | ||
| const result = await getOnnxAnalysis(); | ||
| return result; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error('Error in analyzeSatelliteImage tool:', error); | ||
| return { error: 'Failed to analyze satellite image.' }; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Executes the logic for generating embeddings by calling the mock service. | ||
| */ | ||
| export async function executeGenerateEmbeddings(args: z.infer<typeof generateEmbeddingsSchema>) { | ||
| try { | ||
| console.log(`Executing generateEmbeddings tool with text: "${args.text}"`); | ||
| const result = await getEmbeddings(args.text); | ||
| return result; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error('Error in generateEmbeddings tool:', error); | ||
| return { error: 'Failed to generate embeddings.' }; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
executeAnalyzeSatelliteImage and executeGenerateEmbeddings swallow errors and return { error: string }, but the rest of the pipeline treats the result as if it were the success shape (SatelliteIntelligence / Embeddings). This makes failures look like successes until they crash downstream (UI/formatting).
Suggestion
Use a consistent result envelope for tools (e.g., type ToolResult<T> = { ok: true; data: T } | { ok: false; error: string }) and make router + UI handle both paths.
type ToolResult<T> = { ok: true; data: T } | { ok: false; error: string }Then return ok: false in catch blocks, and update callers to branch on ok.
Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.
lib/agents/resolution-search.tsx
Outdated
| // Delegate the core analysis to the router agent. | ||
| const analysisResult = await routerAgent(messages) as SatelliteIntelligence | ||
|
|
||
| // Adapt the result from the sub-agent to the format expected by the UI. | ||
| const summary = `Analysis: ${analysisResult.analysis}\nConfidence: ${analysisResult.confidenceScore}\nDetected Objects: ${analysisResult.detectedObjects.join(', ')}` | ||
|
|
||
| // Create a mock GeoJSON object since the mock tool doesn't provide one. | ||
| // In a real implementation, this would be generated based on the analysis result. | ||
| const geoJson = { | ||
| type: 'FeatureCollection', | ||
| features: [ | ||
| { | ||
| type: 'Feature', | ||
| geometry: { | ||
| type: 'Point', | ||
| coordinates: [0, 0], // Placeholder coordinates | ||
| }, | ||
| properties: { | ||
| name: 'Analysis Center', | ||
| description: 'This is a placeholder based on mock analysis.', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Construct the final object that conforms to the expected schema. | ||
| const finalObject = { | ||
| summary, | ||
| geoJson, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // an object that includes the raw analysis result for the UI to use. | ||
| return { | ||
| ...resolutionSearchSchema.parse(finalObject), | ||
| satelliteIntelligence: analysisResult, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
resolutionSearch force-casts the router output to SatelliteIntelligence and then builds a summary from its fields. However, the router can return embeddings or an error object, which will yield bad summaries (or throw if fields are missing) and will store invalid satelliteIntelligence into the state. This is a correctness issue in the main agent pipeline.
Suggestion
Make routerAgent return a discriminated union (e.g., { tool: 'analyzeSatelliteImage'; result: ... }) and branch here. Only attach satelliteIntelligence when that tool ran successfully.
const routed = await routerAgent(messages)
if (routed.tool === 'analyzeSatelliteImage' && routed.result.ok) {
const si = routed.result.data
// build summary + attach satelliteIntelligence
} else {
// produce a safe summary and omit satelliteIntelligence (or include an error envelope)
}Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.
lib/agents/resolution-search.tsx
Outdated
| // Create a mock GeoJSON object since the mock tool doesn't provide one. | ||
| // In a real implementation, this would be generated based on the analysis result. | ||
| const geoJson = { | ||
| type: 'FeatureCollection', | ||
| features: [ | ||
| { | ||
| type: 'Feature', | ||
| geometry: { | ||
| type: 'Point', | ||
| coordinates: [0, 0], // Placeholder coordinates | ||
| }, | ||
| properties: { | ||
| name: 'Analysis Center', | ||
| description: 'This is a placeholder based on mock analysis.', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The schema says geoJson.features[].geometry.coordinates is z.any(), and the new implementation always returns placeholder coordinates [0, 0]. This will produce misleading map overlays and may confuse users, especially because the summary now implies real analysis.
If the tool cannot generate GeoJSON, you should either (1) omit map overlay data entirely, or (2) clearly mark it as unavailable rather than silently emitting a fake point.
Suggestion
Prefer returning an empty FeatureCollection (or no geoJson, if the UI tolerates it) instead of fake geometry.
Example:
const geoJson = {
type: 'FeatureCollection',
features: [],
} as constIf the UI requires at least one feature, set a property flag like properties: { name: 'N/A', description: 'GeoJSON not available for this analysis.' } and avoid implying a real location.
Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.
|
https://github.com/coderabbitai do a thorough review of the pull request and ensure the logic is solid and that the feature is working to perfection. The google endpoint is supposed to connect with the alphaearth script |
I have now implemented the AlphaEarth embeddings API as you requested. The |
This commit implements the AlphaEarth embeddings API endpoint at `/api/embeddings`, as requested in the pull request comments. The implementation follows the specifications in `docs/ALPHAEARTH_SETUP.md`. Key changes: - Created a new API route at `app/api/embeddings/route.ts`. - Implemented the logic to read the AlphaEarth index file, fetch the correct GeoTIFF from Google Cloud Storage, and extract the embedding vector for a given latitude, longitude, and year. - Updated the `executeGenerateEmbeddings` sub-agent in `lib/agents/tools/satellite-tools.ts` to call this new endpoint. - Updated the Zod schema for the `generateEmbeddings` tool to accept latitude, longitude, and year.
|
12:42:36.576 Running build in Portland, USA (West) – pdx1 |
I have fixed the build error. The issue was a TypeScript type error in the new embeddings API endpoint. I've removed the incorrect type assertion, and the build should now pass. |
ebb9a6f to
a3e462e
Compare
|
@coderabbitai the embeddings or map output will appear as visualizations and you have to preview them side by side using the mapbox-gl-compare library. Can you use this instead of the custom component that you've built. Make sure its not breaking the code. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 4204 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 12527 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2263 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2021
Current IssuesBuild Errors to Fix:
// Current (fails):
const embedding = Array.from(data[0] as number[]);
// Should be:
const embedding = Array.from(data[0] as TypedArray | number[]);
Visualization Clarification NeededCurrently, your implementation has:
mapbox-gl-compare is designed to compare two side-by-side map views with actual map layers/imagery. However, I don't see:
Questions:
Proposed SolutionOnce you clarify the visualization requirements, I can: Task: Integrate mapbox-gl-compare for side-by-side visualizationPrerequisites
Implementation Plan
Please clarify what should be visualized side-by-side so I can implement the correct solution! 🐰 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 182
✅ Immediate Fixes I Can Apply1. Fix Embeddings TypedArray Error: File: // Current code causing error:
const embedding = Array.from(data[0] as number[]);
// Fixed version:
const data = await image.readRasters({ window });
const rasterData = data[0];
const embedding = typeof rasterData === 'number'
? [rasterData]
: Array.from(rasterData as Float32Array | Float64Array | Uint8Array);2. Add mapbox-gl-compare Package: You'll need to install: ❓ Visualization Requirementsmapbox-gl-compare requires two map instances with actual map layers/tiles to display side-by-side. Current situation:
What mapbox-gl-compare needs:
Critical questions:
Without actual map imagery or tile sources, mapbox-gl-compare won't have anything to display. The text-based Would you like me to:
Please share details about the satellite imagery source and what you want to compare! 🧠 Learnings used💡 Use |
|
@coderabbitai I think the data has to come back in GeoTiff, so think of indexing the embedding and eo data return as geotiff to preview on the compare map. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 4138 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 4747
🎯 Architecture OverviewData Flow:
📋 Implementation PlanTask: Implement GeoTIFF-based visualization with mapbox-gl-compareSteps:
🔍 Key Questions Before Implementation
Once you confirm these details, I'll implement the complete solution! 🚀 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 413
Task: Implement GeoTIFF-based side-by-side visualization with mapbox-gl-compareOverviewTransform the current text-based satellite intelligence display into a dual GeoTIFF visualization using mapbox-gl-compare. The left map will show AlphaEarth embeddings, and the right map will show ONNX analysis results.
|
|
@coderabbitai assume the specific implementations for the endpoints are generic, can you also make sure that the foundational model in the agents is receiving the context of the GeoTiffs or the raw return? |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 14584
🚨 Current ProblemRouter Agent Flow (BROKEN): The model makes ONE decision at line 59 but never receives:
✅ Required Fix: Implement Feedback LoopCorrect Flow: Task: Implement AI context feedback loop for satellite dataGoal: Ensure foundational models receive and synthesize GeoTIFF metadata, embeddings, and ONNX analysis results in their context. Architecture Changes:
📊 Updated ArchitecturesequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ResolutionSearch
participant RouterAgent
participant AI Model
participant SatelliteTools
User->>ResolutionSearch: Query with location
ResolutionSearch->>RouterAgent: Forward messages
RouterAgent->>AI Model: Select appropriate tools
AI Model->>RouterAgent: Tool selection
RouterAgent->>SatelliteTools: Execute tools (ONNX + Embeddings)
SatelliteTools->>RouterAgent: Return GeoTIFF URLs + raw data
Note over RouterAgent: CRITICAL: Feed results back to AI
RouterAgent->>AI Model: Enriched context with GeoTIFF metadata
AI Model->>RouterAgent: Synthesized insights
RouterAgent->>ResolutionSearch: Results + AI synthesis
Note over ResolutionSearch: Format satellite context
ResolutionSearch->>AI Model: Generate comprehensive summary
AI Model->>ResolutionSearch: Final analysis with context
ResolutionSearch->>User: Summary + GeoTIFF visualizations
✅ What This Fixes
The generic endpoint implementations remain flexible while ensuring AI models have full visibility into satellite data! 🛰️ ✏️ Learnings added
🧠 Learnings used💡 Use |
I have now replaced the custom component with a side-by-side map comparison view using the |
This commit replaces the custom `SatelliteIntelligenceDisplay` component with a new `MapCompareView` component that uses the `mapbox-gl-compare` library to provide a side-by-side comparison of the analysis results. Key changes: - Added the `mapbox-gl-compare` dependency. - Created a new `MapCompareView` component at `components/map/map-compare-view.tsx`. - Updated `getUIStateFromAIState` in `app/actions.tsx` to use the new component. - Deleted the old `SatelliteIntelligenceDisplay` component and removed all related logic from `app/actions.tsx`. This change addresses the feedback from the pull request and provides a more effective way to visualize the GeoJSON data.
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain
Architecture Overviewflowchart TD
A["User Query"] --> B["Router Agent"]
B --> C["Satellite Tools"]
C --> D1["Azure ONNX Service"]
C --> D2["Google AlphaEarth"]
D1 --> E1["Returns GeoTIFF URL - Analysis"]
D2 --> E2["Returns GeoTIFF URL - Raw Imagery"]
E1 --> F["API Route Serves GeoTIFFs"]
E2 --> F
F --> G["MapCompareDisplay Component"]
G --> H1["Left Map: Raw Satellite"]
G --> H2["Right Map: ONNX Analysis"]
H1 --> I["mapbox-gl-compare"]
H2 --> I
Implementation PlanI'll create a comprehensive solution that:
Task: Implement GeoTIFF-based satellite visualization with side-by-side comparison
Key Features✅ Side-by-side comparison using mapbox-gl-compare Once you confirm, I'll proceed with implementing these changes! 🛰️🗺️ 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 41 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1139
📦 Installation RequiredYou'll need to install mapbox-gl-compare in your repository: 🔍 What I FoundYour embeddings API (
Now I'll fix the errors and implement the GeoTIFF visualization: Task: Implement GeoTIFF-based satellite visualization with mapbox-gl-compare
📝 Summary of Changes
🚀 Next Steps
Ready to proceed with implementation? 🚀 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 3686 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 936 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 41
🔧 Installation FixThe npm error is due to For the 📊 Key Insight from Embeddings APIYour existing
The fix already exists! Line 88 shows: Let me finalize the implementation with all the pieces: Task: Complete GeoTIFF satellite visualization with side-by-side comparison
📋 Installation ChecklistRun these commands in your repository: 🎯 What This Delivers
Ready to implement? 🚀 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 4607 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 2278 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 434 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 869 Great! ✅ Packages installed successfully. Now let me verify the setup and provide the complete implementation:
🔴 Critical: Missing aef_index.csvYour embeddings API expects this file at the project root. It should map years to GeoTIFF filenames in your GCS bucket. Create year,filename
2020,alphaearth_foundations_2020.tif
2021,alphaearth_foundations_2021.tif
2022,alphaearth_foundations_2022.tif
2023,alphaearth_foundations_2023.tif
2024,alphaearth_foundations_2024.tifReplace the filenames with the actual GeoTIFF files in your 📦 Verification Complete✅ Now implementing the complete solution: Task: Complete GeoTIFF satellite visualization implementation
📝 Final Setup Checklist1. Create
|
I have now updated the AlphaEarth embeddings API to return the raw GeoTIFF data, as you requested. The map comparison view has also been updated to fetch this data, parse it, and display it as a raster layer on the 'after' map. This provides a direct visualization of the GeoTIFF data in the side-by-side comparison. |
This commit updates the AlphaEarth embeddings API to return raw GeoTIFF data and modifies the `MapCompareView` component to handle and display this data. Key changes: - The `/api/embeddings` endpoint now returns the raw GeoTIFF file contents with a `Content-Type` of `image/tiff`. - The `MapCompareView` component has been updated to fetch the GeoTIFF data, parse it using the `geotiff` library, and render it as a raster layer on the "after" map. This change addresses the feedback from the pull request and provides a direct visualization of the GeoTIFF data in the side-by-side comparison view.
I have now updated the data flow to ensure the foundational model receives the context of the GeoTIFF. Here's how it works:
This ensures that the foundational model is aware of the GeoTIFF's contents when it generates the final analysis. |
This commit implements the full data flow for processing GeoTIFF data and feeding it to the foundational model for analysis. Key changes: - The `routerAgent` has been updated to extract latitude, longitude, and year from the image context. - The `generateEmbeddings` tool now returns the raw GeoTIFF data as an `ArrayBuffer`. - The `resolutionSearch` agent has been refactored to process the GeoTIFF data, create a textual summary, and feed it to a foundational model to generate the final analysis and GeoJSON. - The `getUIStateFromAIState` function has been updated to pass the latitude, longitude, and year to the `MapCompareView` component. This ensures that the foundational model has the necessary context to generate a meaningful analysis from the GeoTIFF data.
This commit resolves a build failure by correctly handling the `Buffer` returned from the Google Cloud Storage `download()` method. The `NextResponse` constructor does not accept a `Buffer` as a direct argument. This commit fixes the issue by converting the `Buffer` to a `Blob` before passing it to the `NextResponse` constructor. This ensures the build passes and the API correctly returns the GeoTIFF data.
This commit resolves a build failure by adding a TypeScript declaration file for the `mapbox-gl-compare` library. The `mapbox-gl-compare` library does not include its own TypeScript declarations, which caused a build error. This commit adds a new declaration file at `lib/types/mapbox-gl-compare.d.ts` to declare the module and resolve the error. This ensures the build passes and the `MapCompareView` component can be used without TypeScript errors.
This commit resolves the final build failure by adding a type guard to handle all possible return types from the `readRasters` function in the `MapCompareView` component. The `readRasters` function can return either a `TypedArray` or a single `number`. The previous implementation did not account for the `number` case, which caused a TypeScript error during the build. This fix adds a check to see if the returned data is a `number`. If it is, the code will not attempt to iterate over it. This ensures that the component can handle all possible return types from the `geotiff` library and that the build will succeed.
This commit resolves a build failure by adding a check for the `GCP_PROJECT_ID` and `GCP_CREDENTIALS_PATH` environment variables in the AlphaEarth embeddings API. The previous implementation would throw an error and crash the application if these environment variables were not set. This commit modifies the API to check for the presence of these variables at the beginning of the `GET` handler. If they are not present, the API will return a `500` error with a graceful error message, preventing the application from crashing. This makes the API more robust and ensures that the build will not fail due to missing environment variables.
User description
This change introduces a new sub-agent architecture to the researcher agent, allowing it to delegate tasks to specialized sub-agents for querying external services like Google Cloud and Azure. It includes a new router agent, mock services for the external endpoints, and a new UI component to display the results.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 6779584567337140239 started by @ngoiyaeric
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Introduces sub-agent architecture enabling router agent to delegate specialized tasks
Implements mock satellite services for ONNX analysis and embeddings generation
Adds new UI component to display structured satellite intelligence results
Integrates router agent into resolution search workflow with proper type definitions
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
router-agent.ts
Router agent for sub-agent task delegationlib/agents/router-agent.ts
generateObjectto select appropriatesub-agent tools
analyzeSatelliteImageandgenerateEmbeddingssatellite-tools.ts
Satellite analysis and embeddings tool definitionslib/agents/tools/satellite-tools.ts
analyzeSatelliteImageandgenerateEmbeddingstools
mock-satellite-services.ts
Mock satellite services for external endpointslib/services/mock-satellite-services.ts
SatelliteIntelligenceinterface with analysis, confidencescore, and detected objects
Embeddingsinterface for vector embeddings datagetOnnxAnalysis()mock function simulating Azure ONNXservice
getEmbeddings()mock function simulating Google Cloudembeddings service
index.ts
Add satellite intelligence message typelib/types/index.ts
satellite_intelligenceto theAIMessagetype unionactions.tsx
Integrate satellite intelligence into message handlingapp/actions.tsx
SatelliteIntelligenceDisplaycomponentsatellite_intelligencemessage typesatellite-intelligence-display.tsx
UI component for satellite intelligence displaycomponents/chat/satellite-intelligence-display.tsx
SatelliteIntelligencedata as propsresolution-search.tsx
Integrate router agent into resolution searchlib/agents/resolution-search.tsx
generateObjectcall and system prompt logicresponse