Skip to content

Add pkg configuration for building standalone executable#151

Open
vxpyy9 wants to merge 1 commit intoRationAI:release/v3from
vxpyy9:pkg-build
Open

Add pkg configuration for building standalone executable#151
vxpyy9 wants to merge 1 commit intoRationAI:release/v3from
vxpyy9:pkg-build

Conversation

@vxpyy9
Copy link

@vxpyy9 vxpyy9 commented Feb 25, 2026

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @vxpyy9, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces the necessary configuration to enable the creation of a standalone executable for the xopat project. It involves updating the project's primary entry points and explicitly listing all required assets for packaging, ensuring that the application can be bundled and distributed as a single executable. The changes also include routine updates to the dependency lockfile.

Highlights

  • Standalone Executable Configuration: Added a 'pkg' configuration to package.json, specifying assets required for building a standalone executable version of the application.
  • Entry Point Update: Modified the main entry point in package.json from 'index.php' to 'index.js' and defined a 'bin' entry for the executable.
  • Dependency Lockfile Adjustments: Updated package-lock.json with numerous changes to 'peer' dependency flags across various packages, likely reflecting a dependency resolution update related to the new build configuration.
Changelog
  • package-lock.json
    • Updated peer dependency declarations for numerous packages.
  • package.json
    • Changed the main entry point from 'index.php' to 'index.js'.
    • Added a 'bin' entry pointing to 'index.js'.
    • Introduced a 'pkg' configuration block to list assets for standalone executable bundling.
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces configuration for pkg to enable building a standalone executable version of the application. The changes to package.json correctly update the main entry point to index.js and add the necessary bin and pkg fields. My review focuses on refining the pkg asset configuration to prevent bloating the executable with unnecessary files, such as workspace node_modules, and to optimize the build by excluding source maps in production.

Comment on lines +94 to +95
"plugins/**/*",
"modules/**/*",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The glob patterns plugins/**/* and modules/**/* are too broad. Since this project uses workspaces for plugins and modules, these patterns will include their node_modules directories in the packaged executable. This will significantly increase the executable's size and bundle many unnecessary files.

Consider using more specific glob patterns to include only the necessary assets. For example, if you only need to bundle specific file types, you could do something like this:

"plugins/**/*.{html,css,svg,json}",
"modules/**/*.{html,css,svg,json}"

Please adjust the patterns to match the actual asset files required by your application.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would say that modules and plugins contain explicitly only things we want, except when plugin/module specifies otherwise (like copying assets manually from the root node_modules folder). For now I am afraid we have no stable way of telling which files to include and which not.

"src/**/*",
"ui/**/*",
"openseadragon.js",
"openseadragon.js.map",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Including the source map file openseadragon.js.map in the assets is not recommended for production builds. It increases the size of the final executable and exposes information about the source code structure.

If this configuration is for creating production executables, it's best to remove this line. If source maps are needed for debugging purposes, you might consider creating a separate build configuration or script for development builds.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moreover, OpenSeadragon should not in my opinion be included at all - OSD was at least originally dynamically added by users. However I agree that providing a default might be desirable.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Aiosa
Copy link
Member

Aiosa commented Feb 28, 2026

I added the OSD deps to the release/v3, you can pull the changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants