10 expert engineers. One command. Every angle covered.
A Claude Code plugin that reviews your plans and code through the eyes of specialized engineers — from design to accessibility, frontend to production readiness.
Most code reviews are generalist — one person (or one AI) trying to catch everything. They miss things. A design engineer would have caught the dark mode gap. A performance engineer would have flagged the unbounded memory growth. An accessibility engineer would have noticed the keyboard trap.
Orbit Audit Suite gives you all of them. Each lens is a specialist that knows exactly what to look for in its domain, complete with project-specific gotchas and checklists. Run one lens or all ten — your call.
# Step 1: Add the marketplace
/plugin marketplace add Recusive/Orbit-plugin
# Step 2: Install the plugin
/plugin install audit-suite@orbit-plugin# Audit a plan before implementation
/full-audit docs/plans/my-feature-plan.md
# Audit your uncommitted changes
/full-audit
# Run a single lens
/audit-as-frontend-eng docs/plans/my-feature-plan.md
/audit-as-a11y-eng docs/plans/my-feature-plan.md| # | Skill | Expert | What They Catch |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | audit-as-design-eng |
Design Engineer | Visual hierarchy, design token fidelity, dark mode parity, interactive states, animation quality |
| 2 | audit-as-ux-eng |
UX Engineer | User journey gaps, broken mental models, missing feedback, discoverability, error recovery |
| 3 | audit-as-frontend-eng |
Frontend Engineer | React anti-patterns, Zustand pitfalls, type safety gaps, unnecessary re-renders, bundle bloat |
| 4 | audit-as-backend-eng |
Backend Engineer | Rust error handling, concurrency hazards, resource leaks, IPC mismatches, file system safety |
| 5 | audit-as-structural-eng |
Structural Architect | Module coupling, dependency direction, layer violations, abstraction mismatches, circular deps |
| 6 | audit-as-repo-maintainer |
Repo Maintainer | Convention drift, missing barrel exports, naming inconsistency, dead code, import hygiene |
| 7 | audit-as-prod-readiness |
Production Engineer | Dev/prod parity, missing error recovery, data integrity, rollback safety, deployment gaps |
| 8 | audit-as-dx-eng |
DX Engineer | Error message quality, CLI ergonomics, keyboard-first design, config defaults, developer flow |
| 9 | audit-as-perf-eng |
Performance Engineer | Memory accumulation, IPC latency, streaming bottlenecks, startup impact, long-session stability |
| 10 | audit-as-a11y-eng |
Accessibility Engineer | Screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation, focus management, ARIA compliance, contrast |
Each lens includes a Gotchas section — the most common failures Claude makes from that perspective — and a Signature Section that only that expert produces (e.g., Visual State Coverage matrix, Keyboard Navigation Walkthrough, Resource Budget table).
| Skill | What It Does |
|---|---|
full-audit |
Runs all relevant lenses sequentially into one document with master verdict, cross-cutting concerns, and deduplicated findings |
Plan Mode — audit before you build:
/full-audit docs/plans/my-plan.md
Repo Mode — audit what you've built:
/full-audit
Choose from:
- Uncommitted changes — working tree diff
- Branch vs main — PR-level review
- General repo health — broad codebase check
Not every lens applies to every plan. The orchestrator reads your plan/changes and skips irrelevant lenses automatically:
- Backend-only change? Skips Design, UX, A11y
- Frontend-only? Skips Backend
- Repo Maintainer and Production Readiness always run
Everything consolidates into one file: reviews/audit-plan-full.md
Master Verdict + Cross-Cutting Concerns + All Critical Issues
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
## 1. Design Engineer ← full analysis
## 2. UX Engineer ← full analysis
## 3. Frontend Engineer ← full analysis
...
## 10. Accessibility Engineer ← full analysis
The Cross-Cutting Concerns section is where the real value lives — issues flagged by multiple independent lenses are systemic problems, not isolated nitpicks.
Five reference skills are included in this plugin — no extra installs needed. When an audit lens finds issues, it consults these for detailed guidance:
| Skill | What It Provides |
|---|---|
emil-design-engineering |
Design principles — typography, surfaces, forms, component composition, touch targets |
make-interfaces-feel-better |
Visual polish — concentric border-radius, optical alignment, shadows, font smoothing |
web-animation-design |
Animation rules — easing blueprints, timing, spring physics, GPU-only properties |
web-design-guidelines |
Web Interface Guidelines compliance — structured accessibility and UX review |
vercel-react-best-practices |
45 prioritized React performance rules — waterfalls, bundle size, re-renders, caching |
| Lens | Consults |
|---|---|
| Design | emil-design-engineering, make-interfaces-feel-better, web-animation-design |
| UX | web-design-guidelines, emil-design-engineering |
| Frontend | vercel-react-best-practices |
| Structural | vercel-react-best-practices |
| Performance | vercel-react-best-practices, web-animation-design |
| Accessibility | emil-design-engineering, web-design-guidelines, web-animation-design |
problem-clarifier → write plan → fazxes (scope) → full-audit → implement
Or use individual lenses for focused reviews at any stage.
MIT