Quarantine test_opt_in_label_data_source_when_pvc_exists#4689
Open
geetikakay wants to merge 1 commit intoRedHatQE:mainfrom
Open
Quarantine test_opt_in_label_data_source_when_pvc_exists#4689geetikakay wants to merge 1 commit intoRedHatQE:mainfrom
geetikakay wants to merge 1 commit intoRedHatQE:mainfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Geetika Kapoor <gkapoor@redhat.com>
|
Report bugs in Issues Welcome! 🎉This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features: 🔄 Automatic Actions
📋 Available CommandsPR Status Management
Review & Approval
Testing & Validation
Container Operations
Cherry-pick Operations
Label Management
✅ Merge RequirementsThis PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:
📊 Review ProcessApprovers and ReviewersApprovers:
Reviewers:
Available Labels
AI Features
💡 Tips
For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers. |
openshift-virtualization-qe-bot-4
requested review from
RoniKishner,
mijankow and
vsibirsk
Contributor
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA pytest Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 60 minutes.Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
tests/infrastructure/golden_images/update_boot_source/test_ssp_data_sources.py (1)
1-1:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick winHIGH: PR template is missing required meaningful content.
The PR description must include meaningful text in
##### What this PR does / why we need it:so reviewers can validate intent and risk quickly.As per coding guidelines: “
##### What this PR does / why we need it:— MUST be present AND have meaningful content.”🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@tests/infrastructure/golden_images/update_boot_source/test_ssp_data_sources.py` at line 1, The PR description is missing required meaningful content under the header "##### What this PR does / why we need it:"; update the PR description to include a concise summary of the change, the reason for the change, any potential risks or backwards-compatibility impacts, and a short note on how it was tested (e.g., unit/integration/golden-image updates) so reviewers can validate intent and risk quickly—ensure the header text "##### What this PR does / why we need it:" is present and populated with the content.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Outside diff comments:
In
`@tests/infrastructure/golden_images/update_boot_source/test_ssp_data_sources.py`:
- Line 1: The PR description is missing required meaningful content under the
header "##### What this PR does / why we need it:"; update the PR description to
include a concise summary of the change, the reason for the change, any
potential risks or backwards-compatibility impacts, and a short note on how it
was tested (e.g., unit/integration/golden-image updates) so reviewers can
validate intent and risk quickly—ensure the header text "##### What this PR does
/ why we need it:" is present and populated with the content.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: ddb17aa0-7dfe-43b8-aed0-1673800b4df8
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/infrastructure/golden_images/update_boot_source/test_ssp_data_sources.py
openshift-virtualization-qe-bot
added
lgtm-coderabbitai[bot]
tox:verify-tc-requirement-polarion:running
Collaborator
|
/approve |
Contributor
Author
|
/verified |
Contributor
Test execution plan request detailsCRITICAL: You MUST post an inline review comment on the first changed line of the first file. As an expert software testing engineer, analyze all modified files in this PR and create a targeted test execution plan. Analysis Requirements:
Your deliverable: Test Execution Plan
Guidelines:
Hardware-Related Checks (SR-IOV, GPU, DPDK): When PR modifies fixtures for hardware-specific resources:
CRITICAL WORKFLOW COMPLETION RULES: When responding to this test execution plan request, you MUST follow these rules EXACTLY:
ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS (violating these creates empty/meaningless reviews):
Remember: The pull request review is visible to users. Additional comments are redundant noise. CRITICAL: Before setting "Run smoke tests: True", you MUST use shell scripts to: |
| get_http_image_url, | ||
| ) | ||
| from utilities.constants import DATA_SOURCE_NAME, DEFAULT_FEDORA_REGISTRY_URL, TIMEOUT_5MIN, TIMEOUT_10MIN, Images | ||
| from utilities.constants import ( |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test Execution Plan
Run smoke tests: False
(No dependency chain found from smoke tests to the changed file.)
Tests to run:
tests/infrastructure/golden_images/update_boot_source/test_ssp_data_sources.py::TestDataSourcesOptInLabel::test_opt_in_label_data_source_when_pvc_exists
Note:
test_opt_in_label_data_source_reconciles_after_update_with_existing_pvcandtest_opt_in_label_data_source_reconciles_after_deletion_with_existing_pvcboth depend on the quarantined test viapytest.mark.dependencyand will be automatically skipped when the parent test is xfailed withrun=False.
Contributor
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 7248 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1477 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1735 🧠 Learnings used |
RoniKishner
approved these changes
May 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Short description:
More details:
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for reviewer:
jira-ticket:
Summary by CodeRabbit