Closed
Verify spelling in SVM visualization code - no changes needed#17
Conversation
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Address feedback on SVM visualization and boundaries
Verify spelling in SVM visualization code - no changes needed
Dec 13, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bot reviewer flagged spelling error "boudaries" in commit ad3a0c3. Investigation confirms the actual code is correct:
Status:
src/models/svm_classifier.py:37uses correct spelling:plot_decision_boundarymethod withtitle="SVM Decision Boundary"Conclusion:
Implementation is correct. No code changes required.
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.