Repository navigation
fix(web): resolve Privy wallet payment selection - #123
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
oneshot | 3728338 | Sep 13 2026, 04:46 AM |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fix the Privy user-wallet payment flow so Privy users without a linked wallet receive an embedded Ethereum wallet and connected EVM wallets are selected correctly.
Scope and acceptance criteria
Product and security invariants
Validation
Independent review evidence
Gate A — exact candidate tree before push
Base commit SHA:
246a38af36e291b0538eb0a8f87d1f3b3f1def60Candidate tree SHA:
3a0087bc0be6c2bfed8cfa69bb400039f9478f46Candidate commit SHA:
3728338d60d68476e5d37ab7ae31c4d8c16bb6adReviewer tool:
free-pi-cliReviewer model: not exposed by platform
Verdict:
VERDICT: PASSFindings: no blocking findings. Residual risks: embedded-wallet browser UX is not covered by a real Privy browser session; Privy app IDs must be aligned before deployment; PostgreSQL-gated tests were not run locally because no container runtime was available.
The reviewed tree equals the committed tree (
HEAD^{tree}=3a0087bc0be6c2bfed8cfa69bb400039f9478f46).Gate B — exact remote PR head
Pull request URL/number: to be filled after creation
Remote head commit SHA: to be filled after creation
Remote head tree SHA: to be filled after creation
Reviewer tool:
free-pi-cliReviewer model: pending
Verdict: pending
Findings or residual risks: pending
Gate B reviewed the current remote head and matches Gate A's approved tree, or a fresh Gate A was run for the changed tree.
Agent policy / repository-policy and all applicable CI checks pass.
Risk and rollback
3728338d60d68476e5d37ab7ae31c4d8c16bb6ad.Human merge