Fix merge tree conflicts between Scope and non-Scope nodes #550
+20
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When merging trees, conflicts between a non-Scope node (e.g., `G = C`) and a Scope (e.g., `class G < B; end`) were not being detected. The Scope was simply added to the tree without creating a conflict marker. This commit fixes two issues: 1. `TreeMerger#visit` now handles the case where a Scope conflicts with a non-Scope previous definition. When this occurs, it creates a conflict tree and returns early (since the entire scope is in conflict, not just the header). 2. `ConflictTreeMerger#visit_all` now resets `last_conflict_tree` when encountering a non-`ConflictTree` node. Previously, this variable was never reset, causing non-adjacent ConflictTrees to be incorrectly merged together. For testing, this commit extends `test_merge_create_conflict_tree_constants_and_scopes` to include a constant `G = C` in LHS and `class G < B; end` in RHS. The expected output now includes a conflict block for G showing both the constant assignment and class definition
egiurleo
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2026
amomchilov
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2026
Morriar
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When merging trees, conflicts between a non-Scope node (e.g.,
G = C) and a Scope (e.g.,class G < B; end) were not being detected. The Scope was simply added to the tree without creating a conflict marker.This commit fixes two issues:
TreeMerger#visitnow handles the case where a Scope conflicts with a non-Scope previous definition. When this occurs, it creates a conflict tree and returns early (since the entire scope is in conflict, so there is no need to visit the children of the scope).ConflictTreeMerger#visit_allnow resetslast_conflict_treewhen encountering a non-ConflictTreenode. Previously, this variable was never reset, causing non-adjacent ConflictTrees to be incorrectly merged together.For testing, this commit extends
test_merge_create_conflict_tree_constants_and_scopesto include a constantG = Cin LHS andclass G < B; endin RHS. The expected output now includes a conflict block for G showing both the constant assignment and class definition