Skip to content

docs: dogfood claim names the flagship example contract - #26

Closed
SollanSystems wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/dogfood-claim-precision
Closed

SollanSystems wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/dogfood-claim-precision

Conversation

@SollanSystems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Claim-precision pass on the adoption docs: the "gate gates its maker" dogfood claim now names the exact contract it runs against (examples/coverage-repair), and the install section leads with the uvx loop-engineer / pip install loop-engineer funnel instead of clone-first instructions.

  • README "Adopt in your stack": dogfood claim names the flagship example contract and links it.
  • README install: zero-install uvx first, wheel self-containment stated, clone workflow kept.
  • scripts/test_docs_adoption.py: pins the named-contract claim so it cannot drift from what CI actually gates.
  • CHANGELOG entry.

Test plan

  • uv run --with pytest --with pyyaml python -B -m pytest -q scripts green
  • docs-claims tests pin the new literals

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 5, 2026 22:18

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@SollanSystems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Duplicate: this branch already landed via #25 (squash bb63b8d).

@SollanSystems
SollanSystems deleted the docs/dogfood-claim-precision branch July 5, 2026 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants