Skip to content

Security: implement tests for issues #496, #495, #494, #493 - #530

Merged
Chuks-coderr merged 5 commits into
SoroStream:mainfrom
williamspatrivk-rgb:feat/security-issues-496-495-494-493
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

Security: implement tests for issues #496, #495, #494, #493#530
Chuks-coderr merged 5 commits into
SoroStream:mainfrom
williamspatrivk-rgb:feat/security-issues-496-495-494-493

Conversation

@williamspatrivk-rgb

@williamspatrivk-rgb williamspatrivk-rgb commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Implement comprehensive test suites for four critical security issues:

Test Coverage

This PR adds 16 new test cases covering:

  • Address validation (4 tests)
  • Reentrancy prevention (2 tests)
  • Arithmetic overflow prevention (3 tests)
  • Authorization enforcement (7 tests)

Changes Made

  • Added tests for address validation on stream creation
  • Added tests for reentrancy guard mechanisms
  • Added tests for i128 overflow detection
  • Added comprehensive authorization tests for admin and user operations

Commits

  1. test: implement issue Validate all address inputs to reject the zero address and contract's own address as recipient or sender #496 - address validation tests
  2. test: implement issue Implement reentrancy guard for entry points that invoke external contracts via cross-contract calls #495 - reentrancy guard tests
  3. test: implement issue Add integer bounds checks to prevent arithmetic issues in rate and duration calculations #494 - bounds checking tests
  4. test: implement issue Audit all entry points for missing authorization checks that could allow unauthorised callers #493 - authorization audit tests

Closes #496
Closes #495
Closes #494
Closes #493

williamspatrivk-rgb and others added 4 commits August 29, 2026 02:09
@williamspatrivk-rgb SoroStream Contributors
test: implement issue SoroStream#496 - address validation tests
23ccda8 
Add comprehensive tests for address validation across all entry points:
- Reject zero address as recipient
- Reject contract's own address as recipient
- Reject sender as recipient
- Reject invalid token addresses

Closes SoroStream#496

Co-Authored-By: SoroStream Contributors <noreply@sorostream.io>
@williamspatrivk-rgb SoroStream Contributors
test: implement issue SoroStream#495 - reentrancy guard tests
50ec1c3 
Add comprehensive tests for reentrancy guard mechanism:
- Test that reentrancy attacks are prevented
- Test that reentrancy lock is properly set and cleared
- Verify nested calls cannot occur during cross-contract operations

Closes SoroStream#495

Co-Authored-By: SoroStream Contributors <noreply@sorostream.io>
@williamspatrivk-rgb SoroStream Contributors
test: implement issue SoroStream#494 - bounds checking tests
18f6383 
Add comprehensive tests for i128 overflow prevention:
- Test overflow detection for extreme flow rates
- Test zero flow rate rejection
- Test negative flow rate rejection
- Ensure arithmetic operations are properly bounded

Closes SoroStream#494

Co-Authored-By: SoroStream Contributors <noreply@sorostream.io>
@williamspatrivk-rgb SoroStream Contributors
test: implement issue SoroStream#493 - authorization audit tests
c2e8868 
Add comprehensive tests for authorization checks across entry points:
- Test sender authorization for create_stream
- Test recipient authorization for withdraw
- Test sender authorization for cancel_stream
- Test admin authorization for set_admin
- Test admin authorization for emergency_pause
- Test admin authorization for sweep_fees

Closes SoroStream#493

Co-Authored-By: SoroStream Contributors <noreply@sorostream.io>
@drips-wave

drips-wave Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@williamspatrivk-rgb Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits.

You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀

Learn more about application limits

@Chuks-coderr
Chuks-coderr merged commit e18c144 into SoroStream:main Aug 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment