Support GEM outside Arduino framework#126
Open
mrv96 wants to merge 2 commits intoSpirik:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
Owner
|
Hi, @mrv96 ! That's quite an undertaking! Thank you for sharing=) I have zero experience working with STM32 (so I can not validate it right away), but I think even in its current state this PR can be very valuable to anyone, who would like to use GEM there. I will add link to it somewhere in wiki, so that it would be more easily discoverable. Thank you very much for your contribution! |
Spirik
added
WIP
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I would like to share how I successfully ported GEM to STM32 environment.
I know that this PR is rough, mainly because hardcodes
stm32u5xx_hal.h, but this issue can be easily solved using a function which registers a callback for delays.If someone is interested in this feature, with some refinement, I think this PR could become mergeable.
I tried this with
U8g2.P.S. this breaks backward compatibility because by default
U8G2class is not printable outside Arduino framework