🧪 [Add tests for short date formatter]#34
Conversation
Co-authored-by: TargetMisser <52361977+TargetMisser@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed
This PR addresses the lack of automated testing for
src/utils/dateFormat.ts, specifically focusing onfmtDateShort,fmtTime,fmtOffset, and theMONTHS_ITarray. A robust suite of unit tests has been introduced to ensure correct and expected behavior for these utility functions.📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested
The new tests cover:
fmtDateShort2024-02-292000vs2100leap year rules)fmtTime,fmtOffset)MONTHS_ITcontains correct 12 elements.✨ Result: The improvement in test coverage
The module
src/utils/dateFormat.tsis now covered by automated tests, adding confidence during future refactoring and improving overall reliability. Additionally, the groundwork for testing using Jest andjest-expois correctly configured for any upcoming Expo/React Native-dependent testing.PR created automatically by Jules for task 2681020864161397333 started by @TargetMisser