Skip to content

Feat/workflow contract overhaul#10

Merged
The-Rabak merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/workflow-contract-overhaul
Apr 27, 2026
Merged

Feat/workflow contract overhaul#10
The-Rabak merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/workflow-contract-overhaul

Conversation

@The-Rabak
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

The Rabak and others added 2 commits April 27, 2026 18:54
Tighten the workflows-plan contract so each subphase/task is described as a
self-contained execution unit instead of an implied continuation of adjacent
phases.

- require each task slice to carry explicit scope and containment boundaries
- stress that executors should have the files, success criteria, and
  verification command needed once dependencies are satisfied
- update the execution-readiness checklist to reject plans with missing task
  boundaries
- cover the new planning language with a contract test so the rule stays
  enforced in generated outputs

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@The-Rabak The-Rabak merged commit 0e94b8b into main Apr 27, 2026
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant