Conversation
cverhoef
reviewed
Nov 14, 2025
Contributor
cverhoef
left a comment
cverhoef
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Please also add this new macro to the documentation in the readme.
- I would make the name of the macro shorter by just
unioninstead ofunion_relations. The arguments are relations anyway.
cverhoef
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR introduce a new macro for handling union between multiple input tables where the order of columns or the number of them might not match
Release
main)dev(or other) branchDid you consider?
dbt_project.yml