test: avoid using ElementsMatch in unit tests#1969
Merged
AndrewChubatiuk merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Mar 16, 2026
Merged
Conversation
AndrewChubatiuk
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2026
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 3 files
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="internal/controller/operator/factory/reconcile/statefulset_pvc_expand_test.go">
<violation number="1" location="internal/controller/operator/factory/reconcile/statefulset_pvc_expand_test.go:184">
P2: This assertion makes the test depend on `client.List` returning PVCs in a specific order, which is not guaranteed. The behavior under test already sorts internally; the verification list should stay order-insensitive.</violation>
</file>
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.
| } | ||
| assert.NoError(t, cl.List(ctx, &pvcs, listOpts)) | ||
| assert.ElementsMatch(t, o.expected, pvcs.Items) | ||
| assert.Equal(t, o.expected, pvcs.Items) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P2: This assertion makes the test depend on client.List returning PVCs in a specific order, which is not guaranteed. The behavior under test already sorts internally; the verification list should stay order-insensitive.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At internal/controller/operator/factory/reconcile/statefulset_pvc_expand_test.go, line 184:
<comment>This assertion makes the test depend on `client.List` returning PVCs in a specific order, which is not guaranteed. The behavior under test already sorts internally; the verification list should stay order-insensitive.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ func Test_updateSTSPVC(t *testing.T) {
}
assert.NoError(t, cl.List(ctx, &pvcs, listOpts))
- assert.ElementsMatch(t, o.expected, pvcs.Items)
+ assert.Equal(t, o.expected, pvcs.Items)
}
</file context>
Suggested change
| assert.Equal(t, o.expected, pvcs.Items) | |
| assert.ElementsMatch(t, o.expected, pvcs.Items) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Avoid using imprecise ElementsMatch - use Equal, so that the order would always be preserved