Clarify human-paced deposits and MCP independence - #36
Merged
Conversation
Clarify one active deposit per workspace, contributor handles, destination verification and failed-publication recovery. Align the English and Simplified Chinese routes and keep routine relay notices on the existing content-plane route.
Updated punctuation in project description for clarity.
Replace hyphen with an em dash for clarity.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A contributor handle and human approval do not by themselves prevent overlapping writes. The operating instructions need to say who may deposit, when the turn ends, and what counts as a completed deposit.
This patch documents one active deposit at a time per live workspace while allowing parallel reading and preparation. It distinguishes session identity from write authorization and a writing turn, requires verification at the intended local/GitHub destination, and preserves failed or uncertain work for human-directed recovery.
Changes:
This is an operating-rule and documentation patch. It adds no technical lock, queue, dependencies, schema changes or mandatory branch workflow for routine deposits. Canonical maintenance created no runtime records.
Validation:
b7e5c603c033b97530b3950bcef3c66c2cfe27a0.Paired English/zh-CN text review:
The scenario review is a static review of the paired instructions, not a fresh-agent behavioural test. Merge remains subject to maintainer review.