Preflight
Problem
Each loop needs a clear Computer Use boundary that also survives handoff and respects the current authorization model.
Proposal
Keep Computer Use unavailable to conversation and let work inherit or explicitly select none/local/sandbox. Apply restrictions through current request/tool assembly and the existing authorization service.
Design: PR #28 and its English proposal. Parent: P / #122. PR #28 is documentation only; this issue tracks follow-up implementation or evaluation.
Associated PR: PR #142 (non-draft; base split/btw-loop-models).
Acceptance criteria
Dependencies and delivery
Blocked by: B1 / #123
B8 / #130-B10 / #132 use this runtime boundary; implementation must integrate with the current tool catalog rather than restore dispersed tool injection.
Implementation anchors
Historical prototype 33ee103a62937db3e930c89ba47a648b75cc7772 provides provenance, not code to copy unchanged:
Integrate with the current tool catalog, Skill snapshot assembly, and authorization service, rechecking current master when implementation begins.
Validation
Commands below are required for the implementation PR, not results claimed by this issue.
Existing current-master regression baseline:
uv run pytest tests/unit/test_agent_internal_process.py tests/unit/test_astr_agent_tool_exec.py tests/unit/test_authorization_service.py tests/unit/test_skill_tool_assembly.py
For changed documentation, run pnpm run docs:build from docs/ and make check-md from the repository root. Update OpenAPI and generated outputs together only if the HTTP contract changes.
Out of scope
Authorization redesign, automatic elevation, new sandbox backends, and legacy configuration support are outside scope.
Repository requirements
Follow AGENTS.md, GOVERNANCE.md, and AI_POLICY.md. This issue uses the feature_request template. Keep Python 3.14+, current configuration shapes, existing authorization boundaries, and bilingual feature documentation. A follow-up PR requires human maintainer review and a separate AI-assisted review. Use the feat PR template for the corresponding work.
Author
Agent
Agent note
Codex prepared this development issue at the user's request from PR #28, its discussion, the referenced source, existing tests, and current-master integration points. AI assisted the research and English drafting. Filing this issue changes no runtime behavior and does not claim feature tests or model trials have passed. Remaining decisions concern implementation details and experimental evidence within the stated scope.
Preflight
Problem
Each loop needs a clear Computer Use boundary that also survives handoff and respects the current authorization model.
Proposal
Keep Computer Use unavailable to conversation and let work inherit or explicitly select none/local/sandbox. Apply restrictions through current request/tool assembly and the existing authorization service.
Design: PR #28 and its English proposal. Parent: P / #122. PR #28 is documentation only; this issue tracks follow-up implementation or evaluation.
Associated PR: PR #142 (non-draft; base
split/btw-loop-models).Acceptance criteria
Dependencies and delivery
Blocked by: B1 / #123
B8 / #130-B10 / #132 use this runtime boundary; implementation must integrate with the current tool catalog rather than restore dispersed tool injection.
Implementation anchors
Historical prototype
33ee103a62937db3e930c89ba47a648b75cc7772provides provenance, not code to copy unchanged:loop-specific build configuration.handoff toolset preparation.Computer Use runtime choices.Integrate with the current tool catalog, Skill snapshot assembly, and authorization service, rechecking current master when implementation begins.
Validation
Commands below are required for the implementation PR, not results claimed by this issue.
Existing current-master regression baseline:
For changed documentation, run
pnpm run docs:buildfromdocs/andmake check-mdfrom the repository root. Update OpenAPI and generated outputs together only if the HTTP contract changes.Out of scope
Authorization redesign, automatic elevation, new sandbox backends, and legacy configuration support are outside scope.
Repository requirements
Follow AGENTS.md, GOVERNANCE.md, and AI_POLICY.md. This issue uses the feature_request template. Keep Python 3.14+, current configuration shapes, existing authorization boundaries, and bilingual feature documentation. A follow-up PR requires human maintainer review and a separate AI-assisted review. Use the feat PR template for the corresponding work.
Author
Agent
Agent note
Codex prepared this development issue at the user's request from PR #28, its discussion, the referenced source, existing tests, and current-master integration points. AI assisted the research and English drafting. Filing this issue changes no runtime behavior and does not claim feature tests or model trials have passed. Remaining decisions concern implementation details and experimental evidence within the stated scope.