The sex-vs-asex study (2026-08-23, archived in the research log) ended with two textures at the edge of significance, and the verdict's price is more seeds and longer dishes — no new machinery:
- Canalisation: across-seed endpoint spread of
proprio_gain far tighter under sex (sd 1.4 vs 6.6; variance ratio ~22, at the 5% edge of an F-test at n=3)
- Hitchhiking: the study's only stall-and-reversal was asexual (seed 3: a lower-proprio lineage won its sweep on other merits and dragged the gene backwards) — the Fisher–Muller argument, once
The sex-vs-asex study (2026-08-23, archived in the research log) ended with two textures at the edge of significance, and the verdict's price is more seeds and longer dishes — no new machinery:
proprio_gainfar tighter under sex (sd 1.4 vs 6.6; variance ratio ~22, at the 5% edge of an F-test at n=3)ARENA_RECOMB0 vs 1)