docs(impl): the OG card names the wrong project - #100
Merged
Merged
Conversation
phalanx-og.png reads "InteFL - Federated learning, under fire - 10 strategies, 6 attacks, Byzantine-robust". Those are IntelliFL's name and IntelliFL's figures, so every unfurl of a Phalanx link has been advertising a different project, and none of the three claims describes this one. Records the correction, the art prompt, and the type to set over it. Burning the wordmark in stays: the text a platform renders beside an unfurl varies and some render none, so the card carries its own.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
docs/assets/phalanx-og.pngis the image every Slack, LinkedIn and X unfurl of a Phalanx link has been showing. It reads:That is IntelliFL's name and IntelliFL's figures. The two projects are deliberately separate, and none of those three claims describes this one, whose line is federated learning on the latest Flower, with OpenTelemetry-native observability. The card also carries
github.com/ajbarea/phalanx-flbeneath the wrong wordmark, so it reads as though the two are the same thing.This records the correction and the brief to regenerate it. No asset change yet — the card needs generating, same as the hero.
Two things worth noting in the brief:
Burning the wordmark and tagline into the card is correct and stays. I expected the opposite, since
overrides/main.htmlalready emitsog:titleandog:description— but the text a platform renders beside an unfurl varies and several render none, so a self-carrying card is the current convention. What changes is which project it names, not whether it names one.The card is not a cropped hero. It renders around 500px wide in a feed, where the hero's many-small-nodes field turns to mush. The brief asks for fewer, larger nodes and one focal point, keeping the same cyan/violet emission so the card and the site still read as one thing. Type is composited after the art rather than prompted into it, because image models still set text unreliably.
Sources for the 2026 conventions (1200x630 at 1.91:1, centre safe area, PNG for graphics-with-text): OG image sizes 2026, OG image best practices.