The C# controls for LitMotionAnimations right now are a bit bare. Are there any plans to add access to the Components, especially their Settings, or at least be able to play with a delay, like animation.Play(0.6f) for a 0.6 second delay?
The use case I have, and I'd love to know if there is another way around it, is when having a list of objects of the same type that have a LitMotionAnimation component but you want them to animate with a slight delay. Start animating one, wait for a delay, start animating the next etc. If the amount of objects is unknown until run time (as in they are instantiated at run time) as far as I am aware this cannot be set up with a LitMotionAnimation component.
This is a fairly common situation in GUIs. LitMotion supports it with this (taken from the LitMotion documentation):
LMotion.Create(0f, 10f, 3f)
.WithEase(Ease.OutQuad)
.WithDelay(2f)
.WithLoops(4, LoopType.Yoyo);
But it unfortunately seems to be missing from LitMotionAnimation. Of course there are workarounds, using tasks or coroutines, but a simple parameter to the Play() method would be fantastic.
The C# controls for LitMotionAnimations right now are a bit bare. Are there any plans to add access to the Components, especially their Settings, or at least be able to play with a delay, like animation.Play(0.6f) for a 0.6 second delay?
The use case I have, and I'd love to know if there is another way around it, is when having a list of objects of the same type that have a LitMotionAnimation component but you want them to animate with a slight delay. Start animating one, wait for a delay, start animating the next etc. If the amount of objects is unknown until run time (as in they are instantiated at run time) as far as I am aware this cannot be set up with a LitMotionAnimation component.
This is a fairly common situation in GUIs. LitMotion supports it with this (taken from the LitMotion documentation):
But it unfortunately seems to be missing from LitMotionAnimation. Of course there are workarounds, using tasks or coroutines, but a simple parameter to the Play() method would be fantastic.