Skip to content

Conversation

@derrickaw
Copy link
Collaborator

@derrickaw derrickaw commented Jan 25, 2026

#37375 - part 4 of deprecating pubsublite


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@derrickaw derrickaw changed the title remove website, typescript, etc pubsublite uses remove website, typescript, etc - pubsublite uses Jan 25, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @derrickaw, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request finalizes the removal of Google Cloud Pub/Sub Lite integration across the Apache Beam project. It systematically eliminates all associated code, dependencies, and documentation from various SDKs and project components, ensuring a thorough and clean deprecation of this connector.

Highlights

  • Dependency and Resource Manager Removal: The google-cloud-pubsublite dependency and the PubsubliteResourceManager class, along with its package information, have been completely removed from the it/google-cloud-platform module.
  • Playground Component Cleanup: References to Pub/Sub Lite related components, including PubsubLiteIO, PubsubLiteSink, and PubsubLiteTableProvider for Java, and ReadFromPubSubLite, WriteToPubSubLite for Python, have been removed from the Playground's symbol definitions.
  • TypeScript SDK Deprecation: The pubsublite.ts file and its corresponding export have been removed from the Apache Beam TypeScript SDK, effectively deprecating Pub/Sub Lite support in this SDK.
  • Documentation Updates: All documentation pertaining to Pub/Sub Lite, including its usage in SQL external tables and its entry in the IO connectors table, has been removed from the project's website content.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@derrickaw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

derrickaw commented Jan 25, 2026

Playground Frontend Test failure I think is due to a version issue with Flutter and its dependencies and not related to this PR.

Similar thing happened on a recent related PR - #37383 (comment)

@derrickaw derrickaw marked this pull request as ready for review January 25, 2026 04:08
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@derrickaw derrickaw force-pushed the 20260124_morePubSubLiteRemoval branch from 4a7251c to 2b9fe58 Compare January 27, 2026 14:13
@derrickaw derrickaw requested review from Abacn and ahmedabu98 January 28, 2026 18:46
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmedabu98 ahmedabu98 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not very confident about the changes in website/Dockerfile, can you explain why those changes are necessary?

The rest LGTM

@derrickaw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Not very confident about the changes in website/Dockerfile, can you explain why those changes are necessary?

The rest LGTM

I had noticed in some of the error logs that an older pip install was being used and was trying to improve on it and a recent PR also updated yarn to a particular version and wanted to automate that away, but in reality these improvements should go in another PR. Sorry about that. Thanks.

Side note, a few of these changes were to generated files that I shouldn't have touched and were was kicking off some tests that were perma-red like you mentioned in another PR. I have removed those file changes from this PR.

@derrickaw derrickaw requested a review from ahmedabu98 January 28, 2026 19:44
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers:

R: @damccorm for label website.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

Copy link
Contributor

@Abacn Abacn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this clean up!

LOCATION 'projects/testing-integration/topics/user-location'
```

## Pub/Sub Lite
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

website change becomes effective next day. We can remove website contents after new Beam release drops PubsubLite release.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gotcha, removed the changes, thanks

@github-actions github-actions bot added website and removed website labels Jan 29, 2026
@derrickaw derrickaw requested a review from Abacn January 29, 2026 04:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants