Skip to content

Conversation

@sakthivelmanii
Copy link

Please add a meaningful description for your change here


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@sakthivelmanii sakthivelmanii marked this pull request as draft January 27, 2026 16:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added the build label Jan 27, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @sakthivelmanii, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the dependency management for Google Cloud Spanner within the project's Gradle build system. Instead of explicitly declaring and pinning the Spanner version, the changes delegate this responsibility to the google_cloud_platform_libraries_bom. This approach streamlines versioning, promotes consistency across Google Cloud dependencies, and simplifies future updates by centralizing version control.

Highlights

  • Dependency Version Management: The explicit version definition for google_cloud_spanner_version (previously 6.104.0) has been removed from the build configuration.
  • Spanner BOM Integration: The google_cloud_spanner_bom and google_cloud_spanner_test dependencies are now implicitly managed by the google_cloud_platform_libraries_bom, ensuring version consistency with other Google Cloud Platform libraries.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@bharadwaj-aditya bharadwaj-aditya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor changes

@sakthivelmanii sakthivelmanii force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from a35fe73 to dc8a042 Compare January 29, 2026 20:29
}
SpannerAccessor sa = SpannerAccessor.getOrCreate(spannerConfigWithCredential);
DatabaseClient databaseClient = sa.getDatabaseClient();
return databaseClient.getDialect();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason to undo this change? It seems like it is still probably better to force the SpannerAccessor class to close

def google_cloud_bigdataoss_version = "2.2.26"
// [bomupgrader] determined by: com.google.cloud:google-cloud-spanner, consistent with: google_cloud_platform_libraries_bom
def google_cloud_spanner_version = "6.104.0"
def google_cloud_spanner_version = "6.107.0"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need this version to be tracked at all now or can we remove this line?

SpannerOptions.Builder builder = SpannerOptions.newBuilder();

// Disable gRPC gcp extension which was causing the application thread to stall.
builder.disableGrpcGcpExtension();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the root cause known/is there a timeline for us to remove this? If so, could you please file a Beam issue tracking the fix and reference it in a TODO here?

.map(ValueProvider::get)
.orElse(DEFAULT_SESSION_WAIT_DURATION);
builder.setSessionPoolOption(
SessionPoolOptions.newBuilder().setWaitForMinSessionsDuration(waitDuration).build());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change related to the hangs?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants