Repository navigation
perf: use one null-aware mark join for hashable IN subqueries in projections #25338
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5d819f9
perf: use one null-aware mark join for hashable IN subqueries in proj…
adriangb 6298bd4
fix: forget the NULL-rejecting correlations above a node that can add…
adriangb 210d4e5
docs: q07 of projection_subquery is no longer the nested-loop control
adriangb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
benchmarks/sql_benchmarks/projection_subquery/projection_subquery.suite
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions
6
benchmarks/sql_benchmarks/projection_subquery/queries/q07.sql
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
correlated_filtersrecords a conjunct regardless of what sits above theFilter. A LEFT JOIN (filter on the nullable side) or aROLLUPabove it puts NULLs back into the key, butfilter_rejects_nullstill readsu.y = o.xas "never NULL", so theNOT INanti join losesnull_aware.mainreturns the correct result for both queries below:Fix: drop the recorded filters when the pull up passes such a node, and add both queries to the slt:
fn f_up(&mut self, plan: LogicalPlan) -> Result<Transformed<LogicalPlan>> { + // A node that null-extends or regroups rows can put a NULL back into + // a column that a correlated filter below it rejected. + if may_reintroduce_nulls(&plan) { + self.correlated_filters.clear(); + } let subquery_schema = plan.schema();