Document deprecation of ModelETL#getModel()

[anukalp2804]

Clarified that getModel() is a temporary legacy accessor and will be removed once transform() is fully implemented. Added guidance to rely on the extract -> transform -> load pipeline instead.

This work is part of Issue #1436 – Document Deprecations and improves the deprecation documentation for ModelETL#getModel().

• Confirmed this method is intentionally deprecated as a transitional API
• Added Javadoc explaining why it is deprecated and what to use instead
• No functional behavior changes
• Successfully verified build using mvn clean install

Reference: #1436

/cc @elharo

Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:

• Your pull request should address just one issue, without pulling in other changes.
• Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
• Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
  Note that commits might be squashed by a maintainer on merge.
• Write unit tests that match behavioral changes, where the tests fail if the changes to the runtime are not applied.
  This may not always be possible but is a best-practice.
• Run mvn verify to make sure basic checks pass.
  A more thorough check will be performed on your pull request automatically.
• You have run the integration tests successfully (mvn -Prun-its verify).

If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.

To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.

• I hereby declare this contribution to be licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
• In any other case, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

[elharo]

delete blank line

[anukalp2804]

delete blank line

Thanks for the review. I’ve removed the blank line as requested.