-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
cmake: link terminfo to cpptest/tvm_allvisible when required by LLVM/libedit #18700
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
at445
wants to merge
2
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
at445:fix/tinfo-linking
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+11
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think llvm only requires tinfo but not curses library? we do want to avoid dependency bloat in this case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The dependency should also be specified and captured through llvm config in findllm instead of here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right,
tqchenraises a good point about dependency bloat. Whilefind_package(Curses)often works becauselibtinfois frequently bundled withncurses, explicitly searching forlibtinfois more precise if that's the only required dependency. This helps avoid pulling in unnecessary parts of theCurseslibrary.My initial suggestion aimed for a common, robust way to find terminal-related libraries, but
find_library(TINFO_LIB tinfo)directly addresses the specific missing dependency (libtinfo) as indicated by your problem description. This is amediumseverity suggestion to improve precision and minimize dependencies.Regarding
tqchen's second point, ideally,llvm-configshould provide all necessary linker flags for its dependencies. If it doesn't include-ltinfoon certain systems, then explicitly finding and linking it as a workaround is a pragmatic approach for now. The long-term solution would involve ensuringFindLLVM.cmakeor thellvm-configoutput itself correctly reports this dependency.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you are right! I will rethink about it