Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix Rate Limit Bypass & Exhaustion DoS#653

Draft
arumes31 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel/fix-fast-path-dos-3477825865415276597
Draft

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix Rate Limit Bypass & Exhaustion DoS#653
arumes31 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel/fix-fast-path-dos-3477825865415276597

Conversation

@arumes31

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🚨 Severity: HIGH
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: A fast-path rate limit implementation attempting to avoid parsing c.FormValue() (which reads the request body and can cause exhaustion DoS with large payloads) was still indirectly parsing the form by using a global getRD() helper that called c.FormValue().
🎯 Impact: Attackers could bypass the fast-path protections and cause resource exhaustion (DoS) by sending excessively large POST payloads to the login endpoint, because the server would still buffer and parse the entire body before rejecting the throttled request.
πŸ”§ Fix: Removed the getRD helper function entirely and replaced it with direct calls to c.QueryParam("rd"). This strictly prevents body parsing during error response rendering. The rd state is already maintained safely via the query string appended to the form action URL in the templates.
βœ… Verification: Ran go test ./... which passes successfully, ensuring auth flows remain functional.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 3477825865415276597 started by @arumes31

This commit removes the `getRD` helper function in `internal/handlers/auth.go` and replaces all usages with `c.QueryParam("rd")`.

The `getRD` function conditionally fell back to `c.FormValue("rd")`, which inadvertently triggered body parsing even during fast-path early rate-limiting checks. This defeated the exhaustion DoS protection by forcing the server to buffer and parse large payloads before rejecting the request. The application templates already pass `rd` in the query string of the form action, making body parsing unnecessary.

Co-authored-by: arumes31 <114224498+arumes31@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

βš™οΈ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: cb111ba3-b370-4c55-b327-05cdaed7371a

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • πŸ” Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
πŸ§ͺ Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch sentinel/fix-fast-path-dos-3477825865415276597

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❀️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant