Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughInitialization in the IDP and role packages now propagate initialization errors instead of using fatal logging; the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1567 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.35% 91.35%
=======================================
Files 693 693
Lines 46293 46293
=======================================
Hits 42289 42289
Misses 2685 2685
Partials 1319 1319
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
4b242dd to
5551340
Compare
Some errors have been printed from the initialize methods. They need to be returned to the service manager.
Issue : #1568
Summary by CodeRabbit