chore(deps): bump Node types and tsx

[dependabot]

Update @types/node from 26.6.1 to 26.6.4 and tsx from 4.23.13 to 4.23.15 in the root and ingest workspace. The supported runtime remains Node 22 with pnpm 10.33.0.

Preserve the merged Next, Resend and Vitest updates and their lockfile peer contexts. Reviewed upstream compatibility, exact published versions/integrities, workspace importers and all 1,170 lockfile dependency edges.

Validation on final head 4c5eb8890afcc2c2ee8a0e7ee3a3770bc249aa11:

• Frozen install, formatting, lint, types, 1,569 unit tests across 88 files, and 32 Chromium tests passed.
• Both CodeQL analyses and the aggregate security check passed.
• Fresh Linux and Windows native acceptance passed, covering ordinary-user Windows launcher checks, portable archive/install, packaged browser behavior, upgrades and crash recovery.
• Codex review found no major issues on ab976a25fe09423d43398e0f4b1c5ea107bd7bde.

The final ancestry refresh preserves the reviewed source tree exactly: ba44ad156605126b06c172ffe8212e12dabe0dd8. The earlier stalled Windows run was cancelled and is not counted as passed. The replacement completed successfully on the final head. Candidate assembly was skipped because this was a pull-request validation run; no release was published.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: atk0309/project_Examify/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 3ef9d1b5-d876-4e32-b752-9222e92c6045

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[dependabot]

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot recreate.

[atk0309]

@codex review

Review current cumulative head e76becc. Focus on Exact Node type/tsx pins in root and ingest, compatible Node22 runtime, and cumulative Next16.3.8/Vitest5.0.3 peer contexts. Earlier updates are preserved for parallel full-tree validation; merges will occur individually in order after checks pass.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-05T21:01:14.053672Z	ab976a2	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

Reviewed commit: e76beccd3e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[atk0309]

@codex review

Review new cumulative source head ab976a2. Carries exactly the launcher health-check fix and deterministic live-unhealthy regression from #129, while preserving exact type/tsx pins and preceding Next/Resend/Vitest peer records. Verify final integrated startup cleanup and dependency graph. Full new-source native checks are required.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: ab976a25fe

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".