Skip to content

docs: mark port 5564 as assigned to slotstream in PORTS reserved ranges (#6031) - #6073

Merged
atomantic merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claim/issue-6031
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

docs: mark port 5564 as assigned to slotstream in PORTS reserved ranges (#6031)#6073
atomantic merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claim/issue-6031

Conversation

@atomantic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Fixes the 5562-5569 reserved-ranges summary in docs/PORTS.md (line 135), which incorrectly listed port 5564 as unassigned. Port 5564 is allocated to portos-slotstream (SLOTSTREAM: 5564 in ecosystem.config.cjs and server/lib/ports.js, plus the port table and on-demand notes in the same document — overlooked when #5815 added slotstream). The summary now lists 5564 slotstream (on demand) as assigned and narrows the unassigned range to 5565-5567, 5569.

Test plan

  • Verified port 5564 against the canonical sources before editing: SLOTSTREAM: 5564 in both ecosystem.config.cjs and server/lib/ports.js.
  • npm test -- lib/ports.test.js (server workspace): 7 passed.
  • Self-reviewed the diff: one line in docs/PORTS.md, no other files touched.
  • Local reviewer (mtplx, low effort) returned no verdict — no model is configured for the mtplx reviewer in this environment. Recorded as review-blocked per swarm protocol.

Closes #6031

@atomantic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Review-blocked: the mtplx local reviewer returned no verdict (no model configured for the mtplx reviewer in this environment). The change is a docs-only one-liner verified against the canonical PORTS sources, self-reviewed, with ports tests passing — leaving the PR open for CI/human review.

@atomantic
atomantic merged commit eace867 into main Sep 3, 2026
7 checks passed
@atomantic
atomantic deleted the claim/issue-6031 branch September 3, 2026 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs/PORTS.md reserved ranges summary incorrectly lists port 5564 (portos-slotstream) as unassigned

1 participant