Skip to content

Walker documentation partly outdated #8

Description

@Technologicat

The documentation and docstrings of Walker need updating:

  • ctx is passed by name, not positionally.
  • ctx is just an arbitrary user-defined name; it has no special meaning. This is essentially a mechanism to pass in arbitrary named arguments that will be propagated following the rules explained in the documentation.
  • Some up-to-date usage examples with one and two ctx items would make the documentation easier to understand.

I could take a look at this and perhaps submit a PR later.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions