curious if this would be desired

[ralyodio]

I use torlink and have contributed to it (the whole api endpoints was me) and now I use it on two seedboxes. But I need a kickass player so I built https://nixamp.com -- winamp on steroids, plus napster, plus x402.

nixamp has a fully programmable cli as well and tui in addition to pwas.

would there be any interest when browsing files in torlink to have a "watch now" or "go live" button? that uses nixamp?

Nixamp allows you to create lives off a server y ou're managing. and then there's an 800 number voice line. I think this could really transform learning and education.

[baairon]

I'd rather keep other products out of torlink itself and just make the headless side flexible enough that anything can build on it, nixamp included. If there's something missing there that would make nixamp's side easier, open a PR and I'll take a look.

[ralyodio]

its working we don't need to integrate. but a directory of torlink servers would be cool, maybe an option to publish your torlink server on nixamp? that would be enogh and drive usage.

[baairon]

A directory of torlink servers is a cool idea, and I'm thinking we get there by first making servers easier for any app or agent to plug into:

• Named tokens scoped to what each app needs (read, add, control, delete, files), revocable one at a time
• An info endpoint that tells an app the version and what its token can do
• A cap on failed token attempts
• Later, an opt-in publish that sends just a name and a link to any directory, and can be pulled anytime

Let me know what you think of that approach.

[ralyodio]

i have torlink runnin on 2 public servers over at https://nixamp.com/directory you can see them if you browser the directory. its flawless that why i wanted api access

[baairon]

thats so sick lol

Also, cool blog by the way: https://dev.profullstack.com/~anthony/blog/123-post.html

[ralyodio]

thanks, i'm keeping busy trying to scrape for tokens.