Skip to content

chore(main): release 1.0.0-rc.3 - #117

Open
ben-ranford wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main
Open

ben-ranford wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main

Conversation

@ben-ranford

@ben-ranford ben-ranford commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

1.0.0-rc.3 (2026-09-16)

Features

  • agent: project validated config limits (#74) (c755dd0)
  • conformance: serialize bounded reports (#85) (1bb2f07)
  • focus: add modal focus lifecycle helpers (#83) (9d4c162)
  • keymap: add versioned profile codec (#90) (623adb7)
  • release: verify anonymous release consumers (#68) (d07d074)
  • render: select output products (#72) (e205262)
  • replay: add transcript inspector (#84) (1f9dca7)
  • semantic: add bounded tree queries (#82) (eb09cfe)
  • semantic: add negotiated patch detail (#81) (2d86b5c)
  • session: add publication waits (#78) (e807bd0)
  • session: decouple effect admission (#73) (d906271)

Bug Fixes

  • docs: correct semantic snapshot version (#69) (4dde3e6)
  • human: reject cancelled line driver open (#71) (e255f7e)
  • rigor: fail fuzz discovery errors (#66) (ab9370f)
  • rigor: inventory exported value semantics (#67) (0298e57)
  • surface: reject truncated wide cells (#70) (f51a24b)

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-16T04:20:04.093298Z 6269edf New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@ben-ranford
ben-ranford force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch 9 times, most recently from 932ea08 to 4e338b4 Compare September 15, 2026 01:08

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4e338b4653

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md Outdated
All notable changes to this repository are tracked here. The format follows
Keep a Changelog and Stave uses Semantic Versioning.

## [1.0.0-rc.3](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/compare/v1.0.0-rc.2...v1.0.0-rc.3) (2026-09-15)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep Unreleased as the first version section

Adding this release above the existing ## [Unreleased] heading leaves future pending entries below an already published version. Once the next change is recorded there, the changelog will present it as older than rc.3 and consumers scanning the newest section can miss it; move Unreleased ahead of this release heading (or remove that workflow entirely if Release Please exclusively owns the file).

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ben-ranford
ben-ranford force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch 2 times, most recently from cae8f3a to d07e23d Compare September 15, 2026 03:30

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d07e23d312

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md
<!-- x-release-please-start-version -->
```sh
go get github.com/ben-ranford/stave@v1.0.0-rc.2
go get github.com/ben-ranford/stave@v1.0.0-rc.3

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep the install command on the published candidate

Immediately after this release PR merges, v1.0.0-rc.3 does not exist yet: docs/releasing.md requires checks and several manual gates before the tag is created, and docs/client-adoption.md accordingly says to pin it only after publication. During that potentially extended interval, the README's primary installation command fails with an unknown revision even though v1.0.0-rc.2 remains usable. Keep the command on the published candidate until tagging completes, or explicitly present rc.3 as a post-publication command.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ben-ranford
ben-ranford force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch 2 times, most recently from 66960d4 to 8b508f0 Compare September 16, 2026 03:35

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8b508f02ab

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
### Features

* **agent:** project validated config limits ([#74](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/74)) ([c755dd0](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/c755dd08a005f6d7ea0a637e59d598366a0eb88d))
* **conformance:** serialize bounded reports ([#85](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/85)) ([1bb2f07](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/1bb2f0735a102a855ab11988360da0098ec2b081))

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Align the conformance report guide with rc.3

When v1.0.0-rc.3 is tagged from this release commit, the report API and CLI are included and this entry advertises them as an rc.3 feature, but docs/conformance-reports.md still describes the same functionality as belonging to a local checkout of the unreleased 1.1 development surface. Consumers of the candidate therefore receive contradictory availability guidance; update that guide as part of this release.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ben-ranford
ben-ranford force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch from 8b508f0 to a7ff411 Compare September 16, 2026 03:58

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a7ff4113ea

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
* **focus:** add modal focus lifecycle helpers ([#83](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/83)) ([9d4c162](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/9d4c1629399bbe7e5a7e9d530465b31981af6b6e))
* **release:** verify anonymous release consumers ([#68](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/68)) ([d07d074](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/d07d074430d59e9f81aedf347f36cf0d33781998))
* **render:** select output products ([#72](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/72)) ([e205262](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/e20526212fdc8bec3d5aba596cbf008ecccd5305))
* **replay:** add transcript inspector ([#84](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/84)) ([1f9dca7](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/1f9dca722ea10aa0be6e90fed0d2093ef1e59487))

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Align the replay inspector documentation with rc.3

When v1.0.0-rc.3 is published, this entry includes cmd/stave-replay in the candidate, but README.md:106-109 and docs/replay-inspector.md:3 still describe it as an unreleased v1.1.0-only command. This gives rc.3 consumers contradictory availability guidance, so update those descriptions as part of the release.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@ben-ranford
ben-ranford force-pushed the release-please--branches--main branch from a7ff411 to 6269edf Compare September 16, 2026 04:18
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6269edfb26

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
* **agent:** project validated config limits ([#74](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/74)) ([c755dd0](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/c755dd08a005f6d7ea0a637e59d598366a0eb88d))
* **conformance:** serialize bounded reports ([#85](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/85)) ([1bb2f07](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/1bb2f0735a102a855ab11988360da0098ec2b081))
* **focus:** add modal focus lifecycle helpers ([#83](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/83)) ([9d4c162](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/9d4c1629399bbe7e5a7e9d530465b31981af6b6e))
* **keymap:** add versioned profile codec ([#90](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/issues/90)) ([623adb7](https://github.com/ben-ranford/stave/commit/623adb775dc16431e227635ca33e84e83e22236f))

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Mark the keymap codec as available in rc.3

When v1.0.0-rc.3 is tagged, this entry includes keymap.Map.Encode and keymap.Decode, but docs/accessibility-agent-parity.md:3-6 still says those APIs are unreleased, local-checkout-only functionality awaiting the next release. This gives rc.3 consumers contradictory availability guidance, so update that guide as part of this release.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant