Goal
Find a concrete scenario where an external reality anchor could accidentally be treated as ENTITY authority instead of attributed evidence in the current ENTITY v3.4.2 release.
Current release: https://github.com/blackmore-technology-group/ENTITY/releases/tag/v3.4.2
Examples of anchors include a government registry, sensor network, laboratory system, bank record, corporate registry, court record, certificate authority or other external attester.
Boundary under review
ENTITY should be able to record, in substance:
External system X asserted Y at time T, with this evidence.
It must not silently conclude:
X is sovereign ENTITY authority, Y is universally true, or X owns the governed object merely because it supplied evidence.
A Global Passport, domain profile, mapping or BTDU relationship must not change that boundary by itself.
Useful contribution
Provide one or more realistic threat scenarios, such as:
- stale registry data;
- compromised external APIs;
- conflicting registries;
- revoked attestation authorities;
- replayed evidence snapshots;
- transport authenticity confused with semantic truth;
- resolver/provider participation confused with authority;
- BTDU provenance edges confused with ownership/rights;
- an AI/sensor source treated as authoritative merely because it can sign output.
For each scenario, identify the invariant, rule, test or vector that should fail closed.
A small invalid vector, focused test or specification clarification is welcome but not required for the initial review.
Use the v3.4.2 tag and identify the exact files/specification material reviewed. A reproducible failure is useful evidence.
Goal
Find a concrete scenario where an external reality anchor could accidentally be treated as ENTITY authority instead of attributed evidence in the current ENTITY v3.4.2 release.
Current release: https://github.com/blackmore-technology-group/ENTITY/releases/tag/v3.4.2
Examples of anchors include a government registry, sensor network, laboratory system, bank record, corporate registry, court record, certificate authority or other external attester.
Boundary under review
ENTITY should be able to record, in substance:
It must not silently conclude:
A Global Passport, domain profile, mapping or BTDU relationship must not change that boundary by itself.
Useful contribution
Provide one or more realistic threat scenarios, such as:
For each scenario, identify the invariant, rule, test or vector that should fail closed.
A small invalid vector, focused test or specification clarification is welcome but not required for the initial review.
Use the
v3.4.2tag and identify the exact files/specification material reviewed. A reproducible failure is useful evidence.