Fix: Accept clang-cl where clang is for Windows ARM64 support#2747
Open
PaulDance wants to merge 1 commit intobriansmith:mainfrom
Open
Fix: Accept clang-cl where clang is for Windows ARM64 support#2747PaulDance wants to merge 1 commit intobriansmith:mainfrom
clang-cl where clang is for Windows ARM64 support#2747PaulDance wants to merge 1 commit intobriansmith:mainfrom
Conversation
Otherwise fails when it can succeed just fine, as long as the flags used are compatible, but that is a downstream responsibility. Signed-off-by: Paul Mabileau <paul.mabileau@harfanglab.fr>
PaulDance
changed the title
clang-cl where clang is for Windows ARM64 support
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Otherwise fails when it can succeed just fine, as long as the flags used are compatible, but that is a downstream responsibility.
Could fix #2215 and therefore supersede #2699, but I only saw them afterwards, so I don't know exactly.