Research: causal assertion downstream jurisdiction RC0 — terminal - #82
Draft
camerontjs-dot wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
camerontjs-dot
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Terminal disposition
SUPPORTED_BOUNDED_CAUSAL_JURISDICTION_INFORMATION_GAP.
Exact evidence:
b1bcc33e2b5ef0707b8cbf7dd8e821b2d34d1b55b42c827acb0a9fe65353354d709add0e27bab3075c89b16a73900d1412fcefb4c04b2242bfad913c35362333971, job105656367388105549619397c2e93b717d9a9920217306134a2ad6b48a462e1b47fc3fcd2472fa147550cf4Ordinary categorical support and explicit-source-causal-assertion support are indistinguishable under current normative C2 + supported-claim Decision inputs: both validate, both have the same terminal/relation/basis shape, both CLEAR, and both produce the same effect.
C2 has no in-band semantic-jurisdiction slot and rejects one; supported-claim Decision context likewise has no such slot and rejects one.
This does not declare the current generic policy wrong. It proves that a stronger causal downstream gate lacks sufficient normative input.
Initial run
35362208871is preserved as a workflow path-interpolation defect, not semantic evidence.Next: compare fail-closed routing vs an independently bound jurisdiction manifest before considering any Contract C widening.
No maintained source change, Contract C mutation, Authorization, execution, merge, or release.