Skip to content

Conversation

@jurgenwerk
Copy link
Contributor

This flag's purpose was to iterate on the feature's development while having it checked in in main. Now that we tested it in staging and it looks good, I think we can simply get rid of the conditional behavior.

@github-actions
Copy link

Host Test Results

    1 files  ± 0      1 suites  ±0   1h 34m 0s ⏱️ +17s
1 821 tests +18  1 807 ✅ +19  14 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 840 runs  +19  1 826 ✅ +21  14 💤 ±0  0 ❌  - 1 

Results for commit 5ea9ce7. ± Comparison against base commit 5218788.

This pull request removes 1 and adds 19 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
Chrome ‑ error
Chrome ‑ Integration | CardDef-FieldDef relationships test: CardDef field (plural) linked to from a FieldDef renders in atom format
Chrome ‑ Integration | CardDef-FieldDef relationships test: compound field (plural) contained in a FieldDef renders in atom format (read-only)
Chrome ‑ Integration | CardDef-FieldDef relationships test: primitive field (plural) contained in a FieldDef is read-only
Chrome ‑ Integration | CardDef-FieldDef relationships test: render a CardDef field (singular) linked to from a FieldDef
Chrome ‑ Integration | field configuration: configuration reacts when a consumed linked card field value changes
Chrome ‑ Integration | field configuration: configuration reacts when a linked relationship loads
Chrome ‑ Integration | field configuration: configuration reacts when a parent attribute changes
Chrome ‑ Integration | field configuration: linksTo field passes configuration to embedded card formats
Chrome ‑ Integration | field configuration: linksToMany field passes configuration to embedded card formats
Chrome ‑ Integration | field configuration: merged configuration is injected into field format component
…

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants