Skip to content

fix(validator): ignore retired feed_down_fallback on status - #159

Merged
wallscaler merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/fix-status-ignores-retired-feed-down-fallback-161c
Aug 28, 2026
Merged

wallscaler merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/fix-status-ignores-retired-feed-down-fallback-161c

Conversation

@wallscaler

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tiny follow-up to #157 (squash-merged as af234b3), not a reopen. Codex P2 on #157: leftover [provenance].feed_down_fallback in operator TOML made cathedral-validator status raise an uncaught ValueError before the journal was read, even though status is journal-only and does not use that runtime option.

#157 (comment)

What changed

  • status loads a TOML that still contains [provenance].feed_down_fallback (any value) and reaches the journal / interval settings via health.evaluate.
  • serve, preflight-launch, and reconcile-launch still reject the retired key (ValueError) so a leftover TOML cannot silently imply a fallback exists.
  • _CONFIG_MAP does not grow a mapping for feed_down_fallback. The key is ignored on status; rejected on write/startup paths.
  • Fallback behavior is not restored. A missing / dead feed still fail-closes (existing refactor(validator): make relay the only recurring SN39 posture #157 unit test kept).

Holds

Please review; do not self-merge.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Status is journal-only and does not use the retired
[provenance].feed_down_fallback option. A leftover TOML key still
rejects serve, preflight-launch, and reconcile-launch so a stale
config cannot imply a fallback exists. A missing feed still fails
closed.

Co-authored-by: Ancient Runner  <wallscaler@users.noreply.github.com>
@wallscaler
wallscaler marked this pull request as ready for review August 28, 2026 22:58
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_e8a9103f-3347-4315-aa98-72b1a218f863)

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-28T23:01:01.606163Z c487ed7 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@cursor
cursor Bot requested a review from ai-hpc August 28, 2026 22:59
@wallscaler
wallscaler merged commit 4ef8653 into main Aug 28, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants